Compare
Kingsgrove vs Roselands
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.4 km apart · Kingsgrove profile · Roselands profile
Kingsgrove Roselands
Kingsgrove and Roselands are neighbouring areas in Sydney with similar population sizes. Kingsgrove has a more established feel, with 82% of homes being separate houses and a typical resident age of 42. It has far more schools for its children and a higher share of high earners, with 27.6% of households making $3,000 or more a week. Roselands is younger and more densely built, with a typical age of 38 and a higher share of flats and apartments. It also has much stronger street connectivity, with 285 intersections per square kilometre compared to 164 in Kingsgrove.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, with both seeing a high number of people working from home compared to the national figure. They share a strong multicultural character, as both have a very high share of people using a language other than English at home. They are also alike in their typical weekly personal incomes and the size of their households, with about three people per home in both places.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,516
- First area, 2016: 12,446
- First area, 2021: 12,881
- Second area, 2011: 11,167
- Second area, 2016: 11,579
- Second area, 2021: 12,356
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kingsgrove: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Roselands: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Kingsgrove: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Roselands: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Kingsgrove: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Roselands: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Kingsgrove: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Roselands: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Kingsgrove: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Roselands: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Kingsgrove: 2.3% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Roselands: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Kingsgrove: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Kingsgrove: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Roselands: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Kingsgrove: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Roselands: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Kingsgrove: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Roselands: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Kingsgrove: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Roselands: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Kingsgrove: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Kingsgrove: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Roselands: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Kingsgrove: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Roselands: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Kingsgrove: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Kingsgrove: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Roselands: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Kingsgrove: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Roselands: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Kingsgrove: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Roselands: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $504
- First area, 2016: $588
- First area, 2021: $716
- Second area, 2011: $486
- Second area, 2016: $544
- Second area, 2021: $666
- First area, 2011: $1,257
- First area, 2016: $1,564
- First area, 2021: $1,898
- Second area, 2011: $1,157
- Second area, 2016: $1,355
- Second area, 2021: $1,685
- First area, 2011: $1,428
- First area, 2016: $1,774
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,327
- Second area, 2016: $1,525
- Second area, 2021: $1,900
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $480
- First area, 2021: $500
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,350
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,281
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kingsgrove with nearby areas
Compare Roselands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kingsgrove vs Roselands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12166/kingsgrove/vs/SAL13423/roselands