Compare
Gilmore vs Richardson
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.9 km apart · Gilmore profile · Richardson profile
Gilmore Richardson
Richardson and Gilmore are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory with similar population sizes. Richardson has much better public transport, with 9.48 stops per 1,000 people and 2,083 weekly departures, compared to 5.91 stops and 778 departures in Gilmore. Conversely, Gilmore is more walkable for daily needs; 66% of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 29.1% of homes in Richardson have that same access. Gilmore also has more high-income households, with 36.1% earning $3,000 or more a week, compared to 26.3% in Richardson.
Several gaps between the two areas have widened since 2011, including the difference in university qualifications and high-income earners. Despite these shifting trends, the two areas remain very alike in other ways. They have nearly identical shares of children under 15, people aged 65 and over, and residents living with long-term health conditions. Both areas also have a similar number of people per home, with Richardson at 2.6 and Gilmore at 2.8.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,843
- First area, 2016: 2,750
- First area, 2021: 2,706
- Second area, 2011: 3,133
- Second area, 2016: 3,006
- Second area, 2021: 3,058
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gilmore: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Richardson: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Gilmore: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Gilmore: 0.8% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Gilmore: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Richardson: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Richardson: 2.9% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Richardson: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Gilmore: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Gilmore: 4.3% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $862
- First area, 2016: $957
- First area, 2021: $1,164
- Second area, 2011: $781
- Second area, 2016: $863
- Second area, 2021: $1,012
- First area, 2011: $1,874
- First area, 2016: $2,161
- First area, 2021: $2,416
- Second area, 2011: $1,632
- Second area, 2016: $1,840
- Second area, 2021: $2,043
- First area, 2011: $2,106
- First area, 2016: $2,371
- First area, 2021: $2,725
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $2,061
- Second area, 2021: $2,327
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $430
- Second area, 2011: $272
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $391
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,037
- First area, 2021: $2,048
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Compare Richardson with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gilmore vs Richardson [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071077/gilmore/vs/801071087/richardson