Compare
Gilmore vs Macarthur
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.2 km apart · Gilmore profile · Macarthur profile
Gilmore Macarthur
Gilmore and Macarthur are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory that differ sharply in accessibility and wealth. Gilmore is much more walkable, with 66% of homes within 15 minutes of groceries and 99.1% within 10 minutes of public transport. In contrast, Macarthur is far more affluent, where the typical weekly household income is $3,037 and 36.3% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 23.4% in Gilmore. Macarthur also has a higher share of outright homeowners at 42.4%, while Gilmore has a far higher proportion of renters at 22.6%.
Both areas sit near the national figure for overall advantage and share very similar household sizes, with about 2.8 to 2.9 people per home. While the gap in typical weekly income has narrowed since 2011, other differences have grown. For example, the gap in the share of people using another language at home has widened, with Gilmore now well higher at 14.9% compared to 8.9% in Macarthur.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,843
- First area, 2016: 2,750
- First area, 2021: 2,706
- Second area, 2011: 1,460
- Second area, 2016: 1,427
- Second area, 2021: 1,405
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gilmore: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Macarthur: 0.4% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Gilmore: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Macarthur: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Gilmore: 0.8% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Macarthur: 1.1% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Gilmore: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Macarthur: 3.1% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Macarthur: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Macarthur: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Macarthur: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Macarthur: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Macarthur: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Macarthur: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Gilmore: 3.5% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Macarthur: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Gilmore: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Macarthur: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Macarthur: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Gilmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Macarthur: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Gilmore: 3.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Macarthur: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Gilmore: 3.7% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Macarthur: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Gilmore: 4.3% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Macarthur: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Gilmore: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Macarthur: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $862
- First area, 2016: $957
- First area, 2021: $1,164
- Second area, 2011: $1,033
- Second area, 2016: $1,133
- Second area, 2021: $1,334
- First area, 2011: $1,874
- First area, 2016: $2,161
- First area, 2021: $2,416
- Second area, 2011: $2,729
- Second area, 2016: $2,680
- Second area, 2021: $3,037
- First area, 2011: $2,106
- First area, 2016: $2,371
- First area, 2021: $2,725
- Second area, 2011: $2,771
- Second area, 2016: $2,856
- Second area, 2021: $3,232
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $430
- Second area, 2011: $445
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,037
- First area, 2021: $2,048
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Compare Macarthur with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gilmore vs Macarthur [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071077/gilmore/vs/801071083/macarthur