Compare
Wambo vs Nanango
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 81 km apart · Wambo profile · Nanango profile
Wambo Nanango
Wambo and Nanango are two rural Queensland areas with very different demographic profiles. Wambo has a much younger population, with a typical resident aged 37, while the typical resident in Nanango is 54. This age difference is seen in the home lives of residents; 27.5% of people in Wambo provide unpaid childcare, which is far higher than the 16.3% in Nanango. Wambo also has more people working or looking for work (61.7%) compared to Nanango (36.5%), and a higher share of residents who have finished Year 12 (42.4% versus 29.3%).
Many of the gaps between these two areas have widened since 2011. The age difference has grown from 11 to 17 years, and the gap in home ownership has increased, with homes far more likely to be owned outright in Nanango (49.8%) than in Wambo (32.1%). Despite these diverging trends, the two areas remain similar in other ways, such as having almost identical rates of one-parent families and a very low reliance on public transport.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,541
- First area, 2016: 17,027
- First area, 2021: 17,015
- Second area, 2011: 9,411
- Second area, 2016: 9,678
- Second area, 2021: 10,003
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Wambo: 0.8% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Wambo: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Wambo: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Wambo: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 5.4% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Wambo: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 5.2% males, 5.3% females
- 60–64 in Wambo: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.3% males, 4.8% females
- 55–59 in Wambo: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Wambo: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Wambo: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Wambo: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Wambo: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Wambo: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Wambo: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Wambo: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Wambo: 3.7% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Wambo: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Wambo: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Wambo: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $569
- First area, 2016: $638
- First area, 2021: $725
- Second area, 2011: $354
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $464
- First area, 2011: $1,155
- First area, 2016: $1,259
- First area, 2021: $1,410
- Second area, 2011: $679
- Second area, 2016: $785
- Second area, 2021: $883
- First area, 2011: $1,367
- First area, 2016: $1,521
- First area, 2021: $1,756
- Second area, 2011: $789
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,114
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $210
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $190
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $1,450
- First area, 2016: $1,400
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Wambo with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Wambo vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/307021183/wambo/vs/319021509/nanango