Compare
Kilcoy vs Nanango
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 45 km apart · Kilcoy profile · Nanango profile
Kilcoy Nanango
Nanango and Kilcoy are both Queensland towns with similar school and rental patterns, but they differ sharply in age and wealth. Nanango has a much older population, with a typical resident aged 54 and 31.7% of people aged 65 or over. This is consistent with a higher health burden, as 40.7% of Nanango residents have a long-term health condition. Kilcoy is noticeably younger and more prosperous, with a typical household income of $1,334 per week compared to $883 in Nanango. Kilcoy also sees far more international migration, with 34.0% of people arriving from overseas recently.
These gaps have generally widened since 2011, especially the difference in typical age, which grew from 5 years to 10 years. Despite these diverging trends, the two areas remain very similar in some respects. They share nearly identical rates of volunteering, a similar proportion of renters, and an almost equal number of schools. Both areas also sit well below the national figure for public transport use, as neither has any scheduled public transport stops.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,840
- First area, 2016: 5,383
- First area, 2021: 5,799
- Second area, 2011: 9,411
- Second area, 2016: 9,678
- Second area, 2021: 10,003
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kilcoy: 0.7% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Kilcoy: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Kilcoy: 2.2% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Kilcoy: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 5.4% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Kilcoy: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 5.2% males, 5.3% females
- 60–64 in Kilcoy: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.3% males, 4.8% females
- 55–59 in Kilcoy: 3.8% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Kilcoy: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Kilcoy: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Kilcoy: 3.2% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Kilcoy: 4.2% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Kilcoy: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Kilcoy: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Kilcoy: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Kilcoy: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Kilcoy: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Kilcoy: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Kilcoy: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $460
- First area, 2016: $548
- First area, 2021: $690
- Second area, 2011: $354
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $464
- First area, 2011: $901
- First area, 2016: $1,075
- First area, 2021: $1,334
- Second area, 2011: $679
- Second area, 2016: $785
- Second area, 2021: $883
- First area, 2011: $1,057
- First area, 2016: $1,275
- First area, 2021: $1,539
- Second area, 2011: $789
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,114
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $240
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $190
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kilcoy with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kilcoy vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/313031370/kilcoy/vs/319021509/nanango