Compare
Highfields vs Nanango
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 79 km apart · Highfields profile · Nanango profile
Highfields Nanango
Highfields and Nanango are two Queensland areas with very different social and economic profiles. Highfields has a much more qualified workforce, with 23.8% of adults holding a bachelor degree compared to 7.1% in Nanango. Incomes are also far higher in Highfields, where the typical household earns $2,104 a week, while the typical household in Nanango earns $883. Nanango is a far older area, with a typical resident aged 54 and a much higher share of people aged 65 and over (31.7% compared to 19.4% in Highfields).
Both areas are similar in their share of people born overseas, which sits around 11%. However, the gaps between them are widening in several areas. The difference in typical ages has grown since 2011, as has the gap in typical weekly incomes. While Highfields has more large homes and higher rents, Nanango has a far higher share of people living alone (32.5% compared to 13.5%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,246
- First area, 2016: 13,180
- First area, 2021: 14,582
- Second area, 2011: 9,411
- Second area, 2016: 9,678
- Second area, 2021: 10,003
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Highfields: 0.7% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Highfields: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Highfields: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Highfields: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 5.4% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Highfields: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 5.2% males, 5.3% females
- 60–64 in Highfields: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.3% males, 4.8% females
- 55–59 in Highfields: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Highfields: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Highfields: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Highfields: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Highfields: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Highfields: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Highfields: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Highfields: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Highfields: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Highfields: 4.5% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Highfields: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 0–4 in Highfields: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $654
- First area, 2016: $748
- First area, 2021: $869
- Second area, 2011: $354
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $464
- First area, 2011: $1,542
- First area, 2016: $1,852
- First area, 2021: $2,104
- Second area, 2011: $679
- Second area, 2016: $785
- Second area, 2021: $883
- First area, 2011: $1,663
- First area, 2016: $1,993
- First area, 2021: $2,284
- Second area, 2011: $789
- Second area, 2016: $957
- Second area, 2021: $1,114
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $408
- Second area, 2011: $190
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $230
- First area, 2011: $1,856
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,900
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Highfields with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Highfields vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/317011450/highfields/vs/319021509/nanango