Compare
Cecil Hills vs Edensor Park
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 3.0 km apart · Cecil Hills profile · Edensor Park profile
Cecil Hills Edensor Park
Edensor Park and Cecil Hills are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with some stark differences. Cecil Hills has a more affluent profile, with 34.7% of households earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 23.0% in Edensor Park. Education and income levels are also notably higher in Cecil Hills, where the typical household earns $2,409 a week, which is $592 more than the usual household in Edensor Park. Additionally, Cecil Hills has a much larger First Nations presence, with 32.0% of people speaking a First Nations language compared to 7.8% in Edensor Park.
Both areas share very similar family life, with nearly identical shares of children under 15 and similar home sizes. They also have the same typical monthly home-loan payment of $2,167. However, some gaps are widening over time; the difference in the share of people who finished Year 12 and the gap in typical household incomes have both grown since 2016. While Edensor Park has more public transport options, more homes in Cecil Hills are within a 15-minute walk of groceries.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 7,017
- First area, 2021: 6,906
- Second area, 2011: 9,441
- Second area, 2016: 9,772
- Second area, 2021: 10,279
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Edensor Park: 0.6% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Edensor Park: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Edensor Park: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Edensor Park: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Edensor Park: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Edensor Park: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Edensor Park: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Edensor Park: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Edensor Park: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Edensor Park: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Edensor Park: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Edensor Park: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Edensor Park: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Edensor Park: 3.2% males, 4.1% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Edensor Park: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Edensor Park: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Edensor Park: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Edensor Park: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $672
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2011: $460
- Second area, 2016: $488
- Second area, 2021: $538
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,409
- Second area, 2011: $1,458
- Second area, 2016: $1,637
- Second area, 2021: $1,817
- First area, 2016: $2,079
- First area, 2021: $2,346
- Second area, 2011: $1,410
- Second area, 2016: $1,565
- Second area, 2021: $1,805
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.5
- Second area, 2016: 3.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $425
- Second area, 2021: $450
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,026
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Compare Edensor Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Hills vs Edensor Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/127011593/cecil-hills/vs/127021514/edensor-park