Compare
Cecil Hills vs West Hoxton - Middleton Grange
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.7 km apart · Cecil Hills profile · West Hoxton - Middleton Grange profile
Cecil Hills West Hoxton - Middleton Grange
West Hoxton - Middleton Grange and Cecil Hills are neighbouring areas with different family and housing profiles. West Hoxton - Middleton Grange is younger, with a typical resident aged 33 and a larger share of children under 15 (25.3%). This is consistent with a much higher share of people caring for children unpaid (31.4%) compared to Cecil Hills (21.4%). In contrast, Cecil Hills has a higher rate of outright home ownership at 35.7%, while only 20.0% of homes in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange are owned this way. Cecil Hills also has a far higher share of people who speak a First Nations language (32.0% compared to 11.1%).
Typical household incomes are almost identical in both areas, sitting around $2,410 a week. They also share similar levels of university qualifications and a very similar number of people per home. While they are alike in these ways, other gaps have grown since 2016. Residents in Cecil Hills are now noticeably older than those in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange, and the difference in the number of people caring for children has also widened.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 7,017
- First area, 2021: 6,906
- Second area, 2016: 15,186
- Second area, 2021: 17,194
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 0.3% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 0.7% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 1.1% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 4.0% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 4.0% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 3.0% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 4.1% males, 3.9% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 4.5% males, 4.4% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 4.6% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in West Hoxton - Middleton Grange: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $672
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2016: $751
- Second area, 2021: $808
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,409
- Second area, 2016: $2,152
- Second area, 2021: $2,412
- First area, 2016: $2,079
- First area, 2021: $2,346
- Second area, 2016: $2,118
- Second area, 2021: $2,408
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2016: 3.7
- Second area, 2021: 3.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2016: $510
- Second area, 2021: $525
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,383
- Second area, 2021: $2,427
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Compare West Hoxton - Middleton Grange with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Hills vs West Hoxton - Middleton Grange [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/127011593/cecil-hills/vs/127011597/west-hoxton-middleton-grange