Compare
Cecil Hills vs Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.3 km apart · Cecil Hills profile · Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park profile
Cecil Hills Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park
Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park and Cecil Hills are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park is a younger place, with a typical resident aged 33 and 24.2% of people being children under 15. It is also more accessible for health services, as 37.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a clinic, compared to just 1.3% in Cecil Hills. By contrast, Cecil Hills has a much higher share of homes owned outright at 35.7% and a far higher proportion of First Nations residents who speak a First Nations language (32.0% compared to 9.0%).
Both areas sit near the national figure for people who have no religion. They are also very similar in their typical weekly household incomes, which are around $2,248 and $2,409 respectively. While they share these commonalities, some gaps are widening; the difference in typical age has grown from three to five years since 2016, and the gap in the share of children under 15 has also increased.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 7,017
- First area, 2021: 6,906
- Second area, 2016: 11,591
- Second area, 2021: 13,263
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 1.7% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.5% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 2.8% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 4.6% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $672
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2016: $672
- Second area, 2021: $762
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,409
- Second area, 2016: $1,966
- Second area, 2021: $2,248
- First area, 2016: $2,079
- First area, 2021: $2,346
- Second area, 2016: $1,926
- Second area, 2021: $2,259
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2016: 3.6
- Second area, 2021: 3.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2016: $480
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,200
- Second area, 2021: $2,342
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Compare Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Hills vs Hoxton Park - Carnes Hill - Horningsea Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/127011593/cecil-hills/vs/127011596/hoxton-park-carnes-hill-horningsea-park