Compare
Ashcroft - Busby - Miller vs Cecil Hills
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.7 km apart · Ashcroft - Busby - Miller profile · Cecil Hills profile
Ashcroft - Busby - Miller Cecil Hills
Ashcroft - Busby - Miller and Cecil Hills are neighbouring areas with very different economic profiles. Cecil Hills is much wealthier, with a typical household income of $2,409 per week compared to $1,027 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller. This gap is reflected in housing and education; 35.7% of Cecil Hills homes are owned outright and 20.3% of adults hold a bachelor degree, while Ashcroft - Busby - Miller has a much higher rental rate of 53.6% and only 7.1% of adults with a degree. Family structures also differ, as one-parent families are far more common in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller at 29.9%.
Both areas share a similar age profile, with about 12% of their populations aged 65 and over. While they are alike in this regard, the gap in household income has widened since 2016. Similarly, the difference in home ownership has grown, as the share of homes owned outright in Cecil Hills is now 16.5 percentage points higher than in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,647
- First area, 2016: 17,341
- First area, 2021: 17,962
- Second area, 2016: 7,017
- Second area, 2021: 6,906
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 0.5% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 0.6% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females
- 15–19 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females
- 10–14 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Ashcroft - Busby - Miller: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $339
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $452
- Second area, 2016: $672
- Second area, 2021: $727
- First area, 2011: $729
- First area, 2016: $891
- First area, 2021: $1,027
- Second area, 2016: $2,137
- Second area, 2021: $2,409
- First area, 2011: $854
- First area, 2016: $1,046
- First area, 2021: $1,232
- Second area, 2016: $2,079
- Second area, 2021: $2,346
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.7
- Second area, 2021: 3.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $160
- First area, 2016: $212
- First area, 2021: $266
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $550
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,700
- First area, 2021: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Ashcroft - Busby - Miller with nearby areas
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ashcroft - Busby - Miller vs Cecil Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/127011504/ashcroft-busby-miller/vs/127011593/cecil-hills