Compare
Cockburn vs Mosman Park
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Cockburn profile · Mosman Park profile
Cockburn Mosman Park
Cockburn and Mosman Park are nearby Western Australian areas with very different layouts. Mosman Park is more walkable, with 92.2% of homes in a 15-minute-city walkshed compared to 63.8% in Cockburn. It is also more academic and affluent; 47.6% of adults in Mosman Park hold a bachelor degree or higher and typical weekly family income is $3,456, while in Cockburn these figures are 24.5% and $2,344. In contrast, Cockburn has far more large homes, with 85.7% having three or more bedrooms compared to 64.0% in Mosman Park.
The gap in typical family income has widened since 2011, now sitting at $1,112. However, the two areas are very similar in other ways, such as having nearly identical unemployment rates and similar proportions of people who have served in the Defence Force. Both areas also share a high level of access to money and resources, and they experience almost the same annual rainfall and maximum temperatures.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 89,683
- First area, 2016: 104,473
- First area, 2021: 118,091
- Second area, 2011: 8,598
- Second area, 2016: 8,757
- Second area, 2021: 9,169
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cockburn: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Mosman Park: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Cockburn: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Mosman Park: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Cockburn: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Mosman Park: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Cockburn: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Mosman Park: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Cockburn: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Cockburn: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Cockburn: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Mosman Park: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Cockburn: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Mosman Park: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Cockburn: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Mosman Park: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Cockburn: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Mosman Park: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Cockburn: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Cockburn: 3.9% males, 4.3% females; 30–34 in Mosman Park: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Cockburn: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 25–29 in Mosman Park: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Cockburn: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Mosman Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Cockburn: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in Cockburn: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Mosman Park: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Cockburn: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Mosman Park: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Cockburn: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Mosman Park: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $691
- First area, 2016: $761
- First area, 2021: $920
- Second area, 2011: $747
- Second area, 2016: $894
- Second area, 2021: $1,030
- First area, 2011: $1,554
- First area, 2016: $1,756
- First area, 2021: $1,995
- Second area, 2011: $1,497
- Second area, 2016: $1,864
- Second area, 2021: $2,132
- First area, 2011: $1,820
- First area, 2016: $2,038
- First area, 2021: $2,344
- Second area, 2011: $2,555
- Second area, 2016: $2,887
- Second area, 2021: $3,456
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $330
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,015
- First area, 2016: $2,058
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $2,582
- Second area, 2016: $2,700
- Second area, 2021: $3,000
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cockburn with nearby areas
Compare Mosman Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cockburn vs Mosman Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA51820/cockburn/vs/LGA55740/mosman-park