Compare
Milang vs Clayton Bay
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Milang profile · Clayton Bay profile
Milang Clayton Bay
Milang (L) and Clayton Bay (L) are nearby South Australian areas with very different levels of convenience. Milang (L) is somewhat walkable, with 96.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 99.3% near a park. In contrast, Clayton Bay (L) is car-dependent, where no homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries. Clayton Bay (L) has seen more movement, with 49.1% of people moving in during the last five years, compared to 35.9% in Milang (L).
Everyday life is very similar in both places, with nearly identical typical weekly household incomes of around $800 and about 10% of the population being children under 15. Both areas are far older than the national figure, though residents in Clayton Bay (L) are noticeably older with a typical age of 61. Since 2011, the gap in typical age has flipped, and Clayton Bay (L) now has a higher share of seniors at 39.4% compared to 31.9% in Milang (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 921
- First area, 2016: 761
- First area, 2021: 831
- Second area, 2011: 321
- Second area, 2016: 199
- Second area, 2021: 386
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 52 yrs
- First area, 2021: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 61 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Milang: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Clayton Bay: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Milang: 1.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Clayton Bay: 0.0% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Milang: 2.6% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Clayton Bay: 6.5% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Milang: 6.4% males, 4.1% females; 70–74 in Clayton Bay: 5.0% males, 6.8% females
- 65–69 in Milang: 5.4% males, 6.5% females; 65–69 in Clayton Bay: 8.6% males, 6.5% females
- 60–64 in Milang: 5.3% males, 6.4% females; 60–64 in Clayton Bay: 6.5% males, 6.3% females
- 55–59 in Milang: 4.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Clayton Bay: 7.1% males, 6.8% females
- 50–54 in Milang: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Clayton Bay: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Milang: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Clayton Bay: 2.4% males, 1.6% females
- 40–44 in Milang: 1.9% males, 0.7% females; 40–44 in Clayton Bay: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 35–39 in Milang: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 35–39 in Clayton Bay: 2.9% males, 0.8% females
- 30–34 in Milang: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Clayton Bay: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 25–29 in Milang: 2.4% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Clayton Bay: 0.8% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Milang: 1.1% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Clayton Bay: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 15–19 in Milang: 2.4% males, 1.4% females; 15–19 in Clayton Bay: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 10–14 in Milang: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Clayton Bay: 1.0% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Milang: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Clayton Bay: 2.4% males, 1.0% females
- 0–4 in Milang: 1.3% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Clayton Bay: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $410
- First area, 2016: $455
- First area, 2021: $488
- Second area, 2011: $686
- Second area, 2016: $752
- Second area, 2021: $477
- First area, 2011: $712
- First area, 2016: $788
- First area, 2021: $827
- Second area, 2011: $1,700
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $796
- First area, 2011: $895
- First area, 2016: $990
- First area, 2021: $1,102
- Second area, 2011: $1,886
- Second area, 2016: $2,031
- Second area, 2021: $1,044
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 1.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $295
- Second area, 2021: $210
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,018
- First area, 2021: $953
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $953
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Milang with nearby areas
Compare Clayton Bay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Milang vs Clayton Bay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL421025/milang/vs/UCL422015/clayton-bay