Compare
Kitchener vs Paxton
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 8.1 km apart · Kitchener profile · Paxton profile
Kitchener Paxton
Paxton and Kitchener are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with distinct differences in accessibility and population. Paxton is more convenient for pedestrians, with 80.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school or public transport, compared to 0% in Kitchener. There is also a notable gap in demographics; 23.8% of Kitchener residents arrived recently from overseas, which is far higher than the 7.4% in Paxton. In terms of housing, Paxton has a much higher share of renters at 17.6%, while Kitchener's rental rate is only 5.8%.
Since 2011, several gaps between the two areas have shifted, such as the difference in the proportion of people who have moved recently and the typical age of residents. Despite these shifts, both areas remain very similar in other ways, with nearly identical shares of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (around 10%) and almost the same proportion of people who finished Year 12. Both areas are mostly car-dependent, and the typical number of people per home is around three.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 873
- First area, 2016: 936
- First area, 2021: 554
- Second area, 2011: 867
- Second area, 2016: 722
- Second area, 2021: 1,160
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kitchener: 0.7% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Paxton: 0.0% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Kitchener: 0.5% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Paxton: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Kitchener: 1.8% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Paxton: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Kitchener: 1.1% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Paxton: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Kitchener: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Paxton: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Kitchener: 2.6% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Paxton: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Kitchener: 2.6% males, 2.0% females; 55–59 in Paxton: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Kitchener: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Paxton: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Kitchener: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Paxton: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Kitchener: 3.8% males, 2.0% females; 40–44 in Paxton: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Kitchener: 4.4% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Paxton: 2.8% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Kitchener: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Paxton: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 25–29 in Kitchener: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Paxton: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 20–24 in Kitchener: 3.8% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Paxton: 3.1% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Kitchener: 4.9% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Paxton: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Kitchener: 4.9% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Paxton: 4.5% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Kitchener: 4.6% males, 4.9% females; 5–9 in Paxton: 4.7% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Kitchener: 2.2% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Paxton: 4.1% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $710
- First area, 2016: $757
- First area, 2021: $609
- Second area, 2011: $387
- Second area, 2016: $416
- Second area, 2021: $719
- First area, 2011: $1,686
- First area, 2016: $1,827
- First area, 2021: $2,010
- Second area, 2011: $756
- Second area, 2016: $641
- Second area, 2021: $1,663
- First area, 2011: $2,031
- First area, 2016: $1,926
- First area, 2021: $2,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,018
- Second area, 2016: $831
- Second area, 2021: $1,839
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $130
- Second area, 2021: $345
- First area, 2011: $2,400
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,365
- Second area, 2016: $680
- Second area, 2021: $1,668
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kitchener with nearby areas
Compare Paxton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kitchener vs Paxton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL121061/kitchener/vs/UCL121093/paxton