Paxton · Urban Centre

Walkability in Paxton

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Slightly flatter terrain than the New South Wales average helps Paxton (L) avoid steep climbs, but it remains mostly car-dependent. While most homes are near parks and schools, the area lacks basic essentials, as no one can walk to a grocery store or health service within 15 minutes.

Open map →
📍 Paxton, Urban Centre

Where Paxton sits — Walkability score

3.8 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Paxton — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Paxton3.8
2325, NSW 3.7
New South Wales 6.2

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Paxton by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for the area is 3.8, which is far below the New South Wales figure of 6.2. While 80.1% of homes have some amenities within a 15-minute walk, the variety of these spots is well below the state average.

3.8

Mostly car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.4

Lower than 54% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

80.1%

Higher than 70% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Walking access is a mixed bag; 86.3% of homes are within 15 minutes of a school, far above the state average. However, this is contrasted by a total lack of nearby groceries and health services, which are far below national and state figures.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has 23 intersections per square kilometre and a mean terrain slope of 5.4%, which is a little below the New South Wales average. With only 7.8 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, this is far below the state figure.

7.8

Lower than 83% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

5.4%

Higher than 61% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Paxton

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Paxton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL121093/paxton/topic/walkability