Compare
Port Hedland vs Not in any Significant Urban Area
Urban Area comparison ≈ 1,772 km apart · Port Hedland profile · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile
Port Hedland Not in any Significant Urban Area
Port Hedland and Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT) are far apart and show very different social profiles. Port Hedland is a younger, wealthier area where the typical resident is 32 and typical weekly household income is $2,882. In contrast, residents in Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT) are far older, with a typical age of 43 and a typical weekly household income of $1,497. Port Hedland also has a far higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 18.0%, while Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT) has much more linguistic diversity, with 40.6% of people using a language other than English at home.
Both areas have similar shares of adults with a bachelor degree or higher, which sits close to the national figure. Beyond this, the two places have drifted further apart. The gap in typical ages has widened to 11 years since 2011, and the difference in home ownership has grown, with 32.2% of homes in Not in any Significant Urban Area (OT) owned outright compared to just 7.3% in Port Hedland.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,772
- First area, 2016: 13,828
- First area, 2021: 15,298
- Second area, 2011: 3,029
- Second area, 2016: 4,587
- Second area, 2021: 4,788
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 31 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Hedland: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.6% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females; 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females; 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Port Hedland: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.3% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Port Hedland: 1.0% males, 0.9% females; 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Port Hedland: 2.6% males, 1.6% females; 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Port Hedland: 4.2% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Port Hedland: 5.5% males, 5.1% females; 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.5% females; 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.6% females; 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Port Hedland: 4.6% males, 4.4% females; 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,369
- First area, 2016: $1,361
- First area, 2021: $1,542
- Second area, 2011: $830
- Second area, 2016: $712
- Second area, 2021: $829
- First area, 2011: $2,817
- First area, 2016: $2,578
- First area, 2021: $2,882
- Second area, 2011: $1,671
- Second area, 2016: $1,377
- Second area, 2021: $1,497
- First area, 2011: $2,947
- First area, 2016: $3,000
- First area, 2021: $3,278
- Second area, 2011: $1,731
- Second area, 2016: $1,568
- Second area, 2021: $1,890
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $228
- Second area, 2016: $140
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $2,503
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $805
- Second area, 2016: $1,400
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Hedland vs Not in any Significant Urban Area [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/5010/port-hedland/vs/9000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area