Compare
Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Port Hedland
Urban Area comparison ≈ 764 km apart · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile · Port Hedland profile
Not in any Significant Urban Area Port Hedland
Not in any Significant Urban Area (WA) and Port Hedland are two very different Western Australian places. Port Hedland is much younger and wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $2,882 compared to $1,448 in Not in any Significant Urban Area (WA). Housing also differs sharply; 67.3% of homes in Port Hedland are rented, while 36.7% are owned outright in Not in any Significant Urban Area (WA). The latter is also older, with a typical resident aged 42 compared to 32 in Port Hedland.
Since 2011, the gaps between the two have mostly grown. The difference in typical age has widened to 10 years, and the share of renters in Port Hedland is now 40.6 percentage points higher than in Not in any Significant Urban Area (WA). Despite these trends, the two areas are alike in other ways. They have almost the same share of people with a bachelor degree or higher (around 12% to 13%) and a similar proportion of residents who do not have a religion.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 303,267
- First area, 2016: 289,509
- First area, 2021: 283,092
- Second area, 2011: 13,772
- Second area, 2016: 13,828
- Second area, 2021: 15,298
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Port Hedland: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Port Hedland: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Port Hedland: 1.0% males, 0.9% females
- 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Port Hedland: 2.6% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Port Hedland: 4.2% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Port Hedland: 5.5% males, 5.1% females
- 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.5% females
- 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Port Hedland: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $602
- First area, 2016: $686
- First area, 2021: $752
- Second area, 2011: $1,369
- Second area, 2016: $1,361
- Second area, 2021: $1,542
- First area, 2011: $1,127
- First area, 2016: $1,307
- First area, 2021: $1,448
- Second area, 2011: $2,817
- Second area, 2016: $2,578
- Second area, 2021: $2,882
- First area, 2011: $1,347
- First area, 2016: $1,573
- First area, 2021: $1,833
- Second area, 2011: $2,947
- Second area, 2016: $3,000
- Second area, 2021: $3,278
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $170
- First area, 2021: $203
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $228
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $2,503
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Not in any Significant Urban Area vs Port Hedland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/5000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area/vs/5010/port-hedland