Compare
Broome vs Port Hedland
Urban Area comparison ≈ 463 km apart · Broome profile · Port Hedland profile
Broome Port Hedland
Port Hedland and Broome are far-apart Western Australian hubs with distinct economic profiles. Port Hedland is a high-earning area where 42.8% of households make $3,000 or more a week, compared to 27.7% in Broome. Renting is far more common in Port Hedland, where 67.3% of homes are rented. The two places also differ in layout; Port Hedland has far better access to public transport, with 94.1% of homes within a 10-minute walk, while Broome is far more walkable for groceries (71.3%) and health services (30.9%).
Income gaps between the two are narrowing, as the difference in typical weekly household pay fell from $1,101 in 2011 to $660 today. Despite this, they share some basic similarities, such as having exactly 2.7 people per home and very similar unemployment rates. Both areas have a higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population than the national figure, and both are far younger than the typical Australian community.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 12,766
- First area, 2016: 13,984
- First area, 2021: 14,660
- Second area, 2011: 13,772
- Second area, 2016: 13,828
- Second area, 2021: 15,298
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Broome: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Port Hedland: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Broome: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 75–79 in Broome: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Port Hedland: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 70–74 in Broome: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Port Hedland: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 65–69 in Broome: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Port Hedland: 1.0% males, 0.9% females
- 60–64 in Broome: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Port Hedland: 2.6% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Broome: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Broome: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Broome: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Port Hedland: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Broome: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Port Hedland: 4.2% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Broome: 4.0% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Port Hedland: 5.5% males, 5.1% females
- 30–34 in Broome: 4.3% males, 5.3% females; 30–34 in Port Hedland: 5.4% males, 5.5% females
- 25–29 in Broome: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 25–29 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 20–24 in Broome: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Broome: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Port Hedland: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Broome: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Port Hedland: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Broome: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Port Hedland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Broome: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Port Hedland: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $983
- First area, 2021: $1,164
- Second area, 2011: $1,369
- Second area, 2016: $1,361
- Second area, 2021: $1,542
- First area, 2011: $1,716
- First area, 2016: $1,939
- First area, 2021: $2,222
- Second area, 2011: $2,817
- Second area, 2016: $2,578
- Second area, 2021: $2,882
- First area, 2011: $2,012
- First area, 2016: $2,226
- First area, 2021: $2,623
- Second area, 2011: $2,947
- Second area, 2016: $3,000
- Second area, 2021: $3,278
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $228
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,593
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,503
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Broome with nearby areas
Compare Port Hedland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Broome vs Port Hedland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/5002/broome/vs/5010/port-hedland