Compare
Broome vs Not in any Significant Urban Area
Urban Area comparison ≈ 1,184 km apart · Broome profile · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile
Broome Not in any Significant Urban Area
Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT) and Broome are far-apart regions with very different profiles. Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT) has a much larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 53.2%, compared to 23.4% in Broome. It is also more linguistically diverse, with 46.2% of people using another language at home, while Broome's figure is 10.8%. Broome has a more qualified workforce and higher incomes; the typical personal weekly income there is $1,164, which is far higher than the $446 typical in Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT).
Both areas share a similar age structure, with children under 15 making up about 23% of the population in each. They also have similar shares of people born overseas and very similar rates of full-time employment. While they share these traits, the gap in typical weekly incomes has widened since 2011, as has the difference in school completion and the share of adults working or looking for work.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 12,766
- First area, 2016: 13,984
- First area, 2021: 14,660
- Second area, 2011: 80,502
- Second area, 2016: 80,511
- Second area, 2021: 79,475
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Broome: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Broome: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.3% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Broome: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Broome: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.3% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Broome: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Broome: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Broome: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Broome: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Broome: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Broome: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Broome: 4.0% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Broome: 4.3% males, 5.3% females; 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 25–29 in Broome: 3.1% males, 4.4% females; 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 20–24 in Broome: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 15–19 in Broome: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Broome: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Broome: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Broome: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $983
- First area, 2021: $1,164
- Second area, 2011: $398
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $446
- First area, 2011: $1,716
- First area, 2016: $1,939
- First area, 2021: $2,222
- Second area, 2011: $1,404
- Second area, 2016: $1,509
- Second area, 2021: $1,619
- First area, 2011: $2,012
- First area, 2016: $2,226
- First area, 2021: $2,623
- Second area, 2011: $1,132
- Second area, 2016: $1,207
- Second area, 2021: $1,223
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2016: $75
- Second area, 2021: $100
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,593
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,872
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.50
- Second area, 2016: 1.30
- Second area, 2021: 1.20
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Broome with nearby areas
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Broome vs Not in any Significant Urban Area [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/5002/broome/vs/7000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area