Compare
Mount Isa vs Not in any Significant Urban Area
Urban Area comparison ≈ 660 km apart · Mount Isa profile · Not in any Significant Urban Area profile
Mount Isa Not in any Significant Urban Area
Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT) and Mount Isa are far-apart regions with very different social and economic profiles. Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT) has a much larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 53.2% and a higher share of people using another language at home (46.2%). In contrast, Mount Isa is more affluent, with a typical weekly personal income of $1,158 compared to $446 in Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT). Education levels also differ, with 49.7% of Mount Isa residents completing Year 12, while only 31.9% did so in Not in any Significant Urban Area (NT).
Both areas share a similar age profile, with people aged 65 and over making up about 8% of the population in each. While they have this in common, other gaps have shifted over time. The difference in typical personal income has widened significantly since 2011, and the gap in adults working or looking for work has also grown. Meanwhile, the gap in the share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents has narrowed since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 73,681
- First area, 2016: 76,985
- First area, 2021: 18,317
- Second area, 2011: 80,502
- Second area, 2016: 80,511
- Second area, 2021: 79,475
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Isa: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.1% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Mount Isa: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.3% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Mount Isa: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Mount Isa: 1.2% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.3% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Mount Isa: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Mount Isa: 2.4% males, 1.9% females; 60–64 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Mount Isa: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Mount Isa: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Mount Isa: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Mount Isa: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Mount Isa: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Mount Isa: 4.2% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 25–29 in Mount Isa: 4.6% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 20–24 in Mount Isa: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 15–19 in Mount Isa: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Mount Isa: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Mount Isa: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 4.0% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Mount Isa: 4.6% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Not in any Significant Urban Area: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $603
- First area, 2016: $643
- First area, 2021: $1,158
- Second area, 2011: $398
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $446
- First area, 2011: $1,219
- First area, 2016: $1,310
- First area, 2021: $2,236
- Second area, 2011: $1,404
- Second area, 2016: $1,509
- Second area, 2021: $1,619
- First area, 2011: $1,491
- First area, 2016: $1,599
- First area, 2021: $2,652
- Second area, 2011: $1,132
- Second area, 2016: $1,207
- Second area, 2021: $1,223
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2016: $75
- Second area, 2021: $100
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,560
- First area, 2021: $1,546
- Second area, 2011: $1,872
- Second area, 2016: $2,037
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.50
- Second area, 2016: 1.30
- Second area, 2021: 1.20
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Isa with nearby areas
Compare Not in any Significant Urban Area with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Isa vs Not in any Significant Urban Area [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/3013/mount-isa/vs/7000/not-in-any-significant-urban-area