Compare
Bundaberg vs Mackay
Urban Area comparison ≈ 533 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Mackay profile
Bundaberg Mackay
Mackay and Bundaberg are both large Queensland hubs, but they have very different profiles. Mackay is a younger area where the typical resident is 37, while the typical person in Bundaberg is 45. This age gap is reflected in the workforce and wealth; 64.2% of Mackay adults are working or looking for work compared to 51.5% in Bundaberg. Consequently, Mackay has much higher typical weekly household incomes, with a $1,834 usual pay compared to $1,186 in Bundaberg.
These gaps in age and income have widened or flipped since 2011. For example, the difference in typical resident age has grown to 8 years, and the typical family income gap has increased to $752. Despite these contrasts, the two areas share a similar physical feel, with both being described as somewhat walkable and having almost identical proportions of detached houses. Both areas also have very similar rates of people who speak little or no English, at around 1%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 133,911
- First area, 2016: 144,787
- First area, 2021: 73,747
- Second area, 2011: 26,214
- Second area, 2016: 26,929
- Second area, 2021: 84,333
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Mackay: 0.7% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Mackay: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 75–79 in Mackay: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 70–74 in Mackay: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Mackay: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Mackay: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Mackay: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Mackay: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Mackay: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Mackay: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Mackay: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Mackay: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Mackay: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Mackay: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Mackay: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Mackay: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Mackay: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Mackay: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $631
- First area, 2016: $697
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $423
- Second area, 2016: $471
- Second area, 2021: $886
- First area, 2011: $1,164
- First area, 2016: $1,339
- First area, 2021: $1,186
- Second area, 2011: $812
- Second area, 2016: $919
- Second area, 2021: $1,834
- First area, 2011: $1,414
- First area, 2016: $1,613
- First area, 2021: $1,472
- Second area, 2011: $979
- Second area, 2016: $1,129
- Second area, 2021: $2,224
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $285
- Second area, 2016: $240
- Second area, 2021: $349
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,668
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,222
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Mackay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Mackay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sua/3003/bundaberg/vs/3011/mackay