Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 3,278 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Bounded Locality and Rural Balance are two very different rural areas located thousands of kilometres apart. Bounded Locality is much younger and more diverse, with 72.7% of people identifying as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and 65.5% using a language other than English at home. It is also a place where renting is common, with 70.5% of households renting, and many people live without a car. In contrast, Rural Balance has a much older population with a typical age of 43, and a high share of people born overseas at 43%. Homes here are more likely to be owned outright, at 35.7%, and most people rely on cars for transport.
Since 2011, the two areas have drifted further apart in several key ways. The age gap has widened significantly, with residents in Rural Balance now 14 years older on average than those in Bounded Locality. The difference in typical weekly personal income has also grown, and the gap in home ownership has widened as more people in Rural Balance own their homes outright. Despite these trends, they share some similarities; for example, both have about the same proportion of people needing help with daily activities and a similar share of homes with three or more bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 24,865
- First area, 2016: 26,270
- First area, 2021: 24,165
- Second area, 2011: 929
- Second area, 2016: 1,429
- Second area, 2021: 976
- First area, 2011: 27 yrs
- First area, 2016: 28 yrs
- First area, 2021: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 0.9% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.5% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 5.3% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 4.1% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 3.7% males, 1.8% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 3.6% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 5.5% males, 1.6% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 7.3% males, 1.5% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.6% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 6.4% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 1.3% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $297
- First area, 2016: $336
- First area, 2021: $337
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $572
- Second area, 2021: $662
- First area, 2011: $1,276
- First area, 2016: $1,328
- First area, 2021: $1,389
- Second area, 2011: $733
- Second area, 2016: $1,095
- Second area, 2021: $1,142
- First area, 2011: $825
- First area, 2016: $876
- First area, 2021: $871
- Second area, 2011: $733
- Second area, 2016: $1,311
- Second area, 2021: $1,447
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.8
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $60
- First area, 2021: $80
- Second area, 2016: $115
- Second area, 2021: $129
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,350
- Second area, 2021: $1,250
- First area, 2011: 1.60
- First area, 2016: 1.40
- First area, 2021: 1.40
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS72/bounded-locality/vs/SOS93/rural-balance