Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 3,947 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Bounded Locality and Rural Balance are two very different places located nearly 4,000 km apart. Bounded Locality is a larger, more developed area where people have much better access to essentials; 60% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, and it is described as somewhat walkable. In contrast, Rural Balance is car-dependent and sparsely populated, with only 3.8% of homes near groceries. There are also sharp cultural contrasts: 43% of Rural Balance residents were born overseas and 28.3% use a language other than English at home, while those figures are much lower in Bounded Locality at 10.7% and 6.2% respectively.
Everyday life in both places shares some similarities, as typical weekly household incomes are almost identical at around $1,140 and unemployment rates are nearly the same. While Bounded Locality has a far higher share of people with no religion (48.6% compared to 26.8%) and a higher proportion of residents with long-term health conditions, some gaps are closing. For example, the difference in the typical age of residents has narrowed from 16 years in 2011 to 6 years today.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 50,459
- First area, 2016: 53,667
- First area, 2021: 51,089
- Second area, 2011: 929
- Second area, 2016: 1,429
- Second area, 2021: 976
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 0.9% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.5% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.3% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 5.3% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 4.1% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 3.7% males, 1.8% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 5.5% males, 1.6% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 7.3% males, 1.5% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 6.4% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.0% males, 1.3% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $452
- First area, 2016: $527
- First area, 2021: $613
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $572
- Second area, 2021: $662
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $1,018
- First area, 2021: $1,144
- Second area, 2011: $733
- Second area, 2016: $1,095
- Second area, 2021: $1,142
- First area, 2011: $1,084
- First area, 2016: $1,292
- First area, 2021: $1,477
- Second area, 2011: $733
- Second area, 2016: $1,311
- Second area, 2021: $1,447
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $175
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2016: $115
- Second area, 2021: $129
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,100
- First area, 2021: $1,100
- Second area, 2016: $1,350
- Second area, 2021: $1,250
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS42/bounded-locality/vs/SOS93/rural-balance