Compare
Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance
Section of State comparison ≈ 1,792 km apart · Bounded Locality profile · Rural Balance profile
Bounded Locality Rural Balance
Bounded Locality and Rural Balance are far-apart areas with very different profiles. Residents in Bounded Locality are far older, with a typical age of 45 compared to 36 in Rural Balance, and 22% are aged 65 or over. This older population is consistent with a higher rate of long-term health conditions (31.6%) and more people needing help with daily activities. In contrast, Rural Balance has a far higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (29.1%) and much higher incomes, with a typical household earning $1,960 a week compared to $1,242 in Bounded Locality. Bounded Locality is also more walkable, with a score of 2.9 (mostly car-dependent) while Rural Balance is 0.3 (car-dependent).
The gap in typical ages has widened since 2011, reflecting the diverging demographic trends of the two places. Despite this, they share some similarities, such as similar unemployment rates and a nearly identical share of people who have served in the Defence Force. Both areas also see about 8% of their workforce working from home, and both have similar rates of renting.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 143,470
- First area, 2016: 143,553
- First area, 2021: 140,652
- Second area, 2011: 33,407
- Second area, 2016: 33,706
- Second area, 2021: 34,172
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bounded Locality: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.2% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Rural Balance: 0.4% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Rural Balance: 1.8% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Rural Balance: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Rural Balance: 3.3% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Rural Balance: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Rural Balance: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Rural Balance: 4.0% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Rural Balance: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Rural Balance: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Rural Balance: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $474
- First area, 2016: $520
- First area, 2021: $618
- Second area, 2011: $597
- Second area, 2016: $766
- Second area, 2021: $817
- First area, 2011: $957
- First area, 2016: $1,060
- First area, 2021: $1,242
- Second area, 2011: $1,425
- Second area, 2016: $1,821
- Second area, 2021: $1,960
- First area, 2011: $1,137
- First area, 2016: $1,278
- First area, 2021: $1,497
- Second area, 2011: $1,483
- Second area, 2016: $1,962
- Second area, 2021: $2,121
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $198
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2016: $100
- Second area, 2021: $235
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,408
- First area, 2021: $1,400
- Second area, 2011: $2,100
- Second area, 2016: $2,300
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.40
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bounded Locality vs Rural Balance [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS32/bounded-locality/vs/SOS73/rural-balance