Compare
Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality
Section of State comparison ≈ 970 km apart · Rural Balance profile · Bounded Locality profile
Rural Balance Bounded Locality
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are two very different environments. Bounded Locality is much more walkable, with 69.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park and 40.2% near groceries, compared to just 16.8% and 4.2% in Rural Balance. Bounded Locality also has a much larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 14.2%. In contrast, Rural Balance is wealthier, with a typical household income of $1,704 a week compared to $1,242 in Bounded Locality, and a far higher share of households earning $3,000 or more weekly (22.2% versus 12.0%).
These income and housing gaps have widened since 2011. Both areas share some common traits, such as similar proportions of children under 15 and a very low share of people who speak little or no English. While Bounded Locality is described as mostly car-dependent, Rural Balance is fully car-dependent. This is consistent with the same trends seen in their work habits, where far more people in Rural Balance work from home (22.1%) than in Bounded Locality (8.0%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 520,596
- First area, 2016: 552,316
- First area, 2021: 574,269
- Second area, 2011: 143,470
- Second area, 2016: 143,553
- Second area, 2021: 140,652
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Bounded Locality: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.2% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Rural Balance: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $513
- First area, 2016: $626
- First area, 2021: $753
- Second area, 2011: $474
- Second area, 2016: $520
- Second area, 2021: $618
- First area, 2011: $1,089
- First area, 2016: $1,367
- First area, 2021: $1,704
- Second area, 2011: $957
- Second area, 2016: $1,060
- Second area, 2021: $1,242
- First area, 2011: $1,294
- First area, 2016: $1,601
- First area, 2021: $1,996
- Second area, 2011: $1,137
- Second area, 2016: $1,278
- Second area, 2021: $1,497
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $198
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,900
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,400
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS13/rural-balance/vs/SOS32/bounded-locality