Compare
Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality
Section of State comparison ≈ 377 km apart · Rural Balance profile · Bounded Locality profile
Rural Balance Bounded Locality
Rural Balance and Bounded Locality are two very different places, despite being the same type of area. Bounded Locality is a small, wealthier hub where 32.8% of adults have a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 17.5% in Rural Balance. This difference in education is reflected in income; the typical weekly household earns $3,183 in Bounded Locality, which is far higher than the $1,704 earned in Rural Balance. While Bounded Locality is mostly car-dependent, it has far better walkability and access to parks. Rural Balance is car-dependent and more sparsely populated, with a higher proportion of people who own their homes outright (47.0% compared to 32.5%).
These two areas share several common traits, such as having the same share of people born overseas (10.1%) and very similar rates of renting. They also have nearly identical proportions of people in de facto relationships. Over time, some gaps have grown, with the difference in typical household income widening since 2011. Meanwhile, the gap in university qualifications has narrowed slightly over the same period.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 520,596
- First area, 2016: 552,316
- First area, 2021: 574,269
- Second area, 2011: 331
- Second area, 2016: 271
- Second area, 2021: 615
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rural Balance: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Bounded Locality: 0.0% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Rural Balance: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Rural Balance: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Bounded Locality: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Rural Balance: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Bounded Locality: 1.5% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Rural Balance: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Bounded Locality: 2.3% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Rural Balance: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Bounded Locality: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Rural Balance: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Bounded Locality: 4.1% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Rural Balance: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Bounded Locality: 3.9% males, 5.4% females
- 40–44 in Rural Balance: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Bounded Locality: 4.6% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Rural Balance: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Bounded Locality: 2.5% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Rural Balance: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Bounded Locality: 1.3% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Rural Balance: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Bounded Locality: 2.8% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Bounded Locality: 1.5% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Rural Balance: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Bounded Locality: 4.4% males, 3.6% females
- 10–14 in Rural Balance: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Bounded Locality: 4.2% males, 4.9% females
- 5–9 in Rural Balance: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Bounded Locality: 4.7% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Rural Balance: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Bounded Locality: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $513
- First area, 2016: $626
- First area, 2021: $753
- Second area, 2011: $953
- Second area, 2016: $880
- Second area, 2021: $1,319
- First area, 2011: $1,089
- First area, 2016: $1,367
- First area, 2021: $1,704
- Second area, 2011: $2,274
- Second area, 2016: $2,055
- Second area, 2021: $3,183
- First area, 2011: $1,294
- First area, 2016: $1,601
- First area, 2021: $1,996
- Second area, 2011: $2,075
- Second area, 2016: $2,550
- Second area, 2021: $3,524
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $315
- Second area, 2021: $380
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,900
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,441
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rural Balance with nearby areas
Compare Bounded Locality with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rural Balance vs Bounded Locality [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sos/SOS13/rural-balance/vs/SOS82/bounded-locality