Compare
Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) vs Fong Lim
State Electorate comparison ≈ 711 km apart · Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) profile · Fong Lim profile
Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) Fong Lim
Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) and Fong Lim are very different environments. Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) has a much larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 41.4%, and a higher share of one-parent families at 23.9%. In contrast, Fong Lim is more cosmopolitan, with 33.1% of people born overseas and 34.5% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. Housing also differs greatly; 77.5% of homes in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) are separate houses, whereas 47.3% of Fong Lim residents live in flats or apartments. Typical weekly rent is also far higher in Fong Lim at $400, compared to $200 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral).
These two areas have drifted further apart since 2011. The gaps in overseas births, university qualifications, and Year 12 completion have all widened. However, they share some similarities, such as having about the same proportion of people aged 65 and over (around 8%). They are also alike in the share of people who live alone, which is about 26% in both places.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 29,126
- First area, 2016: 4,661
- First area, 2021: 35,352
- Second area, 2011: 9,281
- Second area, 2016: 7,990
- Second area, 2021: 8,071
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Fong Lim: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Fong Lim: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Fong Lim: 0.9% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Fong Lim: 1.4% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Fong Lim: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Fong Lim: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Fong Lim: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Fong Lim: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Fong Lim: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Fong Lim: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.8% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Fong Lim: 4.6% males, 4.7% females
- 30–34 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 4.3% males, 5.0% females; 30–34 in Fong Lim: 5.8% males, 5.8% females
- 25–29 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 25–29 in Fong Lim: 5.5% males, 6.1% females
- 20–24 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Fong Lim: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Fong Lim: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Fong Lim: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Fong Lim: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Fong Lim: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $959
- First area, 2016: $875
- First area, 2021: $853
- Second area, 2011: $930
- Second area, 2016: $1,211
- Second area, 2021: $1,294
- First area, 2011: $1,919
- First area, 2016: $1,337
- First area, 2021: $1,757
- Second area, 2011: $1,764
- Second area, 2016: $2,403
- Second area, 2021: $2,378
- First area, 2011: $2,180
- First area, 2016: $988
- First area, 2021: $1,928
- Second area, 2011: $2,050
- Second area, 2016: $2,627
- Second area, 2021: $2,828
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $195
- First area, 2016: $55
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $260
- Second area, 2016: $480
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $794
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,383
- Second area, 2021: $2,080
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) with nearby areas
Compare Fong Lim with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) vs Fong Lim [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED52903/kimberley/vs/SED70012/fong-lim