Fong Lim · State Electorate

Walkability in Fong Lim

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

More than 85% of homes in Fong Lim are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, which is far above the Northern Territory figure. The area is somewhat walkable, though only about half of its homes have a full range of amenities within a 15-minute walk. While parks and transport are easy to reach, health services and schools are much harder to get to on foot.

Open map →
📍 Fong Lim, State Electorate

Where Fong Lim sits — Walkability score

4.9 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Fong Lim — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Fong Lim4.9
Greater Darwin 5.9
Northern Territory 5.1

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Fong Lim by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 4.9, which means the area is somewhat walkable. However, only 51.5% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a result that is far below the Northern Territory average of 61.8%.

4.9

Somewhat walkable of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.5

Lower than 67% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

51.5%

Lower than 68% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to parks (88.9%) and public transport (85.3%) is well above or far above the territory average. In contrast, walking to health services is far below the Northern Territory figure, with only 16.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk, and schools are similarly out of reach for 60% of residents.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 60 intersections per square kilometre, and the terrain slope is about the same as the Northern Territory average at 4.5%. The number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents is 15.9, which is a little below the territory figure.

15.9

Higher than 61% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.5%

Lower than 69% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Fong Lim

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Fong Lim [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED70012/fong-lim/topic/walkability