Compare
Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) vs Fannie Bay
State Electorate comparison ≈ 709 km apart · Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) profile · Fannie Bay profile
Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) Fannie Bay
Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) and Fannie Bay are very different places. Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) has a much larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 41.4%, while 28.2% of Fannie Bay residents were born overseas. Fannie Bay is more highly qualified, with 37.0% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 15.7% in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral). Housing also differs, as Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) is mostly separate houses (77.5%), whereas Fannie Bay is very walkable and has more flats and apartments.
Everyday life shares some common ground, as both areas have similar rates of people providing unpaid care and very similar typical monthly home-loan payments of $2,167. However, many gaps have widened since 2011. This is seen in the growing difference in education levels and the fact that more people in Fannie Bay now work or look for work compared to those in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 29,126
- First area, 2016: 4,661
- First area, 2021: 35,352
- Second area, 2011: 7,463
- Second area, 2016: 8,545
- Second area, 2021: 8,081
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Fannie Bay: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Fannie Bay: 0.9% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Fannie Bay: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Fannie Bay: 2.1% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Fannie Bay: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Fannie Bay: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Fannie Bay: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Fannie Bay: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Fannie Bay: 2.6% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Fannie Bay: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.8% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Fannie Bay: 3.8% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 4.3% males, 5.0% females; 30–34 in Fannie Bay: 4.9% males, 5.2% females
- 25–29 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 25–29 in Fannie Bay: 4.4% males, 5.6% females
- 20–24 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Fannie Bay: 2.2% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Fannie Bay: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Fannie Bay: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Fannie Bay: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral): 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Fannie Bay: 3.2% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $959
- First area, 2016: $875
- First area, 2021: $853
- Second area, 2011: $982
- Second area, 2016: $1,102
- Second area, 2021: $1,225
- First area, 2011: $1,919
- First area, 2016: $1,337
- First area, 2021: $1,757
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $2,123
- Second area, 2021: $2,191
- First area, 2011: $2,180
- First area, 2016: $988
- First area, 2021: $1,928
- Second area, 2011: $2,319
- Second area, 2016: $2,544
- Second area, 2021: $2,619
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $195
- First area, 2016: $55
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $395
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $794
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) with nearby areas
Compare Fannie Bay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimberley (Mining and Pastoral) vs Fannie Bay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED52903/kimberley/vs/SED70011/fannie-bay