Compare
Bundaberg vs Callide
State Electorate comparison ≈ 186 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Callide profile
Bundaberg Callide
Callide and Bundaberg are two distinct Queensland areas with very different layouts. Bundaberg is much more developed, with a walkability score of 5.7 (somewhat walkable) compared to 2.0 (mostly car-dependent) in Callide. This is seen in the daily basics: 74.4% of Bundaberg homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 27.9% of homes in Callide are. Callide is more rural, with a far higher share of separate houses at 91.8%. It also has more schools per 1,000 children (5.64) and a higher share of high earners, with 14.3% of households earning $3,000 or more a week.
The gap in the number of older residents has widened since 2011, with 24.4% of people in Bundaberg now aged 65 and over compared to 19.3% in Callide. Despite this shift, both areas share a similar proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (about 6%) and nearly identical typical monthly mortgage payments of around $1,300. While Bundaberg has more public transport and health services, Callide has a much higher rate of volunteering at 20.3%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 42,084
- First area, 2016: 49,957
- First area, 2021: 50,553
- Second area, 2011: 44,225
- Second area, 2016: 48,417
- Second area, 2021: 51,039
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.4% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Callide: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Callide: 1.3% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Callide: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Callide: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Callide: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Callide: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Callide: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Callide: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Callide: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Callide: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Callide: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Callide: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Callide: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Callide: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Callide: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Callide: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Callide: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Callide: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $558
- First area, 2016: $665
- First area, 2021: $603
- Second area, 2011: $435
- Second area, 2016: $493
- Second area, 2021: $691
- First area, 2011: $1,193
- First area, 2016: $1,449
- First area, 2021: $1,123
- Second area, 2011: $889
- Second area, 2016: $1,046
- Second area, 2021: $1,357
- First area, 2011: $1,407
- First area, 2016: $1,701
- First area, 2021: $1,431
- Second area, 2011: $997
- Second area, 2016: $1,218
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $250
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $235
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,250
- Second area, 2011: $1,426
- Second area, 2016: $1,491
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Callide with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Callide [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30009/bundaberg/vs/SED30015/callide