Compare
Callide vs Nanango
State Electorate comparison ≈ 197 km apart · Callide profile · Nanango profile
Callide Nanango
Callide and Nanango are two Queensland regions with similar populations, though they differ in age and wealth. Callide is younger, with 20.2% of people under 15, and more of its adults are working or looking for work. Typical weekly household income is well higher in Callide at $1,357, compared to $1,069 in Nanango. In contrast, Nanango has a much older population; the typical resident is 48, and 25.9% of people are seniors aged 65 and over.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people with a mental health condition. They are also alike in their housing, with typical weekly rents around $240 and a similar number of people per home. While they share these commonalities, some gaps have widened since 2011. The difference in typical age has increased, and Callide's lead in typical household income has grown from $42 to $288 over the same period.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 44,225
- First area, 2016: 48,417
- First area, 2021: 51,039
- Second area, 2011: 47,785
- Second area, 2016: 50,313
- Second area, 2021: 52,491
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Callide: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Callide: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Callide: 2.0% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Callide: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Callide: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Callide: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Callide: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Callide: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Callide: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Callide: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Callide: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Callide: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Callide: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Callide: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Callide: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Callide: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Callide: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Callide: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $435
- First area, 2016: $493
- First area, 2021: $691
- Second area, 2011: $421
- Second area, 2016: $495
- Second area, 2021: $541
- First area, 2011: $889
- First area, 2016: $1,046
- First area, 2021: $1,357
- Second area, 2011: $847
- Second area, 2016: $1,006
- Second area, 2021: $1,069
- First area, 2011: $997
- First area, 2016: $1,218
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $998
- Second area, 2016: $1,221
- Second area, 2021: $1,334
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $235
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $230
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,426
- First area, 2016: $1,491
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Callide with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Callide vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30015/callide/vs/SED30063/nanango