Compare
Bundaberg vs Gladstone
State Electorate comparison ≈ 182 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Gladstone profile
Bundaberg Gladstone
Bundaberg and Gladstone are two Queensland regional centres with very different profiles. Bundaberg is a much older area, with 24.4% of residents aged 65 and over compared to 12.8% in Gladstone. This is consistent with Bundaberg having a far higher share of people with long-term health conditions (37.7%) and those who need help with daily activities. Bundaberg is also more walkable, with 74.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while Gladstone sits at 44.6%. In contrast, Gladstone is more affluent; typical weekly household income is $1,724, which is well higher than the $1,123 seen in Bundaberg.
These gaps in wealth and age have only widened since 2011, with the difference in the share of seniors now at 11.7%. Despite these diverging trends, the two areas share several traits. They have almost identical proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (around 6%) and similar shares of people who use another language at home. Their typical weekly rents are also nearly the same, sitting at $280 in Bundaberg and $270 in Gladstone.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 42,084
- First area, 2016: 49,957
- First area, 2021: 50,553
- Second area, 2011: 45,060
- Second area, 2016: 46,194
- Second area, 2021: 50,317
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.4% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Gladstone: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Gladstone: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Gladstone: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Gladstone: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Gladstone: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Gladstone: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Gladstone: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Gladstone: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Gladstone: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Gladstone: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Gladstone: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Gladstone: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Gladstone: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Gladstone: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Gladstone: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Gladstone: 4.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Gladstone: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Gladstone: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $558
- First area, 2016: $665
- First area, 2021: $603
- Second area, 2011: $724
- Second area, 2016: $822
- Second area, 2021: $795
- First area, 2011: $1,193
- First area, 2016: $1,449
- First area, 2021: $1,123
- Second area, 2011: $1,686
- Second area, 2016: $1,881
- Second area, 2021: $1,724
- First area, 2011: $1,407
- First area, 2016: $1,701
- First area, 2021: $1,431
- Second area, 2011: $1,946
- Second area, 2016: $2,173
- Second area, 2021: $2,129
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $385
- Second area, 2021: $270
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,250
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,603
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Gladstone with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Gladstone [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30009/bundaberg/vs/SED30028/gladstone