Compare
Bundaberg vs Nanango
State Electorate comparison ≈ 187 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Nanango profile
Bundaberg Nanango
Bundaberg and Nanango are two Queensland areas with very different layouts. Bundaberg is a somewhat walkable hub where 74.4% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, and 83.1% are near public transport. Nanango is car-dependent, with only 26.5% of homes within a short walk of shops. Bundaberg has a much higher share of renters at 35.4%, while Nanango has far more separate houses (93.7%) and a higher rate of outright home ownership at 43.2%.
Both areas are very similar in terms of typical weekly household income, with Bundaberg at $1,123 and Nanango at $1,069. While they share similar income levels, other gaps have shifted since 2011. Residents in Nanango are now noticeably older, with a typical age of 48 compared to 42 in Bundaberg. The gap in renting has also flipped; Bundaberg now has a far higher share of renters than Nanango.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 42,084
- First area, 2016: 49,957
- First area, 2021: 50,553
- Second area, 2011: 47,785
- Second area, 2016: 50,313
- Second area, 2021: 52,491
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.4% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Nanango: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Nanango: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Nanango: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Nanango: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Nanango: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Nanango: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Nanango: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Nanango: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Nanango: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Nanango: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Nanango: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Nanango: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $558
- First area, 2016: $665
- First area, 2021: $603
- Second area, 2011: $421
- Second area, 2016: $495
- Second area, 2021: $541
- First area, 2011: $1,193
- First area, 2016: $1,449
- First area, 2021: $1,123
- Second area, 2011: $847
- Second area, 2016: $1,006
- Second area, 2021: $1,069
- First area, 2011: $1,407
- First area, 2016: $1,701
- First area, 2021: $1,431
- Second area, 2011: $998
- Second area, 2016: $1,221
- Second area, 2021: $1,334
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $230
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,250
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Nanango with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Nanango [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30009/bundaberg/vs/SED30063/nanango