Compare
Emu Park vs Tanby
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.3 km apart · Emu Park profile · Tanby profile
Emu Park Tanby
Emu Park and Tanby are neighbouring Queensland areas with very different profiles. Emu Park is much older, with a typical resident aged 54 and 29.6% of people aged 65 and over, which helps explain why soon-to-be-retired residents are more likely to have homes owned outright. In contrast, Tanby is a younger area where the typical resident is 38. This age gap is reflected in the households; Tanby has a typical weekly income of $2,513, while Emu Park is far lower at $1,192. Emu Park also has more one-parent families (15.5%) and people living alone (28.1%), whereas Tanby has a higher share of couples with children (67.2%).
Both areas share a similar level of higher education, with 14.9% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, which sits close to the national figure. They are also alike in their use of English and the number of people in de facto relationships. While Emu Park is mostly car-dependent, it is far more walkable than Tanby, which is described as car-dependent. This includes a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school (37.7%) or a park (80.9%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,021
- First area, 2016: 2,130
- First area, 2021: 2,281
- Second area, 2011: 422
- Second area, 2016: 539
- Second area, 2021: 577
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Tanby: 0.5% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Tanby: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Tanby: 1.0% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Tanby: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 65–69 in Tanby: 3.6% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 5.1% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Tanby: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 55–59 in Tanby: 4.4% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Tanby: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Tanby: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Tanby: 3.6% males, 2.0% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Tanby: 2.7% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Tanby: 3.7% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.1% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Tanby: 1.4% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Tanby: 2.2% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Tanby: 4.8% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Tanby: 4.8% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Tanby: 4.4% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Tanby: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $485
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $550
- Second area, 2016: $677
- Second area, 2021: $909
- First area, 2011: $884
- First area, 2016: $982
- First area, 2021: $1,192
- Second area, 2011: $1,375
- Second area, 2016: $1,763
- Second area, 2021: $2,299
- First area, 2011: $1,118
- First area, 2016: $1,283
- First area, 2021: $1,435
- Second area, 2011: $1,421
- Second area, 2016: $1,899
- Second area, 2021: $2,513
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $255
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $365
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,266
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Tanby with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Tanby [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30975/emu-park/vs/SAL32738/tanby