Compare
Emu Park vs Keppel Sands
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.2 km apart · Emu Park profile · Keppel Sands profile
Emu Park Keppel Sands
Emu Park and Keppel Sands are neighbouring Queensland areas with very different layouts. Emu Park is more developed, with street connectivity far higher than in Keppel Sands and a typical weekly household income that is well higher at $1,192 compared to $931. Emu Park also has far more homes with three or more bedrooms (77.7% versus 65.0%) and a larger population of children under 15. In contrast, Keppel Sands is somewhat walkable, while Emu Park is mostly car-dependent. This is reflected in the fact that 89.3% of homes in Keppel Sands are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, whereas that figure is 0.0% in Emu Park.
Everyday life shares many similarities in both places, such as a nearly identical proportion of people who have served in the Defence Force and a similar share of those who do not hold a religion. Both areas are older than the national figure, though residents are noticeably older in Keppel Sands, where the typical age is 58. This older demographic is consistent with Keppel Sands having a well higher share of people aged 65 and over (37.2%) and a higher proportion of people with long-term health conditions (41.2%) than Emu Park.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,021
- First area, 2016: 2,130
- First area, 2021: 2,281
- Second area, 2011: 302
- Second area, 2016: 360
- Second area, 2021: 374
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 58 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Keppel Sands: 1.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Keppel Sands: 3.4% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Keppel Sands: 4.8% males, 4.2% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Keppel Sands: 5.0% males, 3.7% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 65–69 in Keppel Sands: 6.1% males, 6.4% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 5.1% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Keppel Sands: 3.4% males, 4.5% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 55–59 in Keppel Sands: 5.6% males, 4.8% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Keppel Sands: 3.7% males, 4.5% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Keppel Sands: 3.7% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Keppel Sands: 0.8% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Keppel Sands: 0.8% males, 1.9% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Keppel Sands: 2.4% males, 1.3% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.1% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Keppel Sands: 2.7% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Keppel Sands: 2.7% males, 0.8% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Keppel Sands: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Keppel Sands: 2.4% males, 1.1% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Keppel Sands: 1.6% males, 0.8% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Keppel Sands: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $485
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $463
- Second area, 2016: $506
- Second area, 2021: $550
- First area, 2011: $884
- First area, 2016: $982
- First area, 2021: $1,192
- Second area, 2011: $704
- Second area, 2016: $939
- Second area, 2021: $931
- First area, 2011: $1,118
- First area, 2016: $1,283
- First area, 2021: $1,435
- Second area, 2011: $738
- Second area, 2016: $1,114
- Second area, 2021: $1,187
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $195
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,263
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Keppel Sands with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Keppel Sands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30975/emu-park/vs/SAL31514/keppel-sands