Compare
Emu Park vs Kinka Beach
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.6 km apart · Emu Park profile · Kinka Beach profile
Emu Park Kinka Beach
Emu Park and Kinka Beach are neighbouring Queensland areas with different housing and amenity profiles. Emu Park is more developed for pedestrians, with 29.8% of homes in a 15-minute-city walkshed compared to 0.0% in Kinka Beach, and far more people living within walking distance of a school. Housing also differs; separate houses are far more common in Emu Park at 89.5%, while Kinka Beach has a much higher share of flats or apartments. Emu Park also has a higher typical weekly household income of $1,192 compared to $867 in Kinka Beach.
These two areas share a very similar proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, each around 5.5% to 5.9%. Both are older than the national figure, though Kinka Beach has a well higher share of people aged 65 and over at 33.7%. Kinka Beach also has a far higher rate of people living alone (39.0%) and a higher share of homes owned outright. Over time, Emu Park has remained more focused on larger family homes, while Kinka Beach has a higher number of single-person households.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,021
- First area, 2016: 2,130
- First area, 2021: 2,281
- Second area, 2011: 629
- Second area, 2016: 621
- Second area, 2021: 674
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Kinka Beach: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Kinka Beach: 3.5% males, 4.7% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Kinka Beach: 3.8% males, 4.8% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 65–69 in Kinka Beach: 5.2% males, 5.7% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 5.1% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Kinka Beach: 4.2% males, 5.2% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 55–59 in Kinka Beach: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Kinka Beach: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Kinka Beach: 3.9% males, 1.5% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Kinka Beach: 1.2% males, 1.7% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Kinka Beach: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Kinka Beach: 1.0% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.1% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Kinka Beach: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.2% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Kinka Beach: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Kinka Beach: 1.5% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Kinka Beach: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $485
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $456
- Second area, 2016: $485
- Second area, 2021: $552
- First area, 2011: $884
- First area, 2016: $982
- First area, 2021: $1,192
- Second area, 2011: $820
- Second area, 2016: $809
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: $1,118
- First area, 2016: $1,283
- First area, 2021: $1,435
- Second area, 2011: $949
- Second area, 2016: $1,007
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $260
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $298
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,410
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Kinka Beach with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Kinka Beach [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30975/emu-park/vs/SAL31549/kinka-beach