Compare
Loftus vs Royal National Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.8 km apart · Loftus profile · Royal National Park profile
Loftus Royal National Park
Royal National Park and Loftus are neighbouring areas in the Sutherland Shire with very different profiles. Royal National Park is sparsely populated, with a typical resident aged just 22 and a weekly family income of $1,625. In contrast, Loftus is a more established residential area where the typical resident is 39 and weekly family incomes are far higher at $2,791. These differences are clear in the local landscape; Loftus is very walkable with a score of 6.2, while Royal National Park is car-dependent with a score of 1.7.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the average school advantage score. While they share this educational standing, they differ in almost every other way. For example, the gap in the number of people aged 65 and over is huge, with 18.2% in Loftus compared to 0.0% in Royal National Park. Royal National Park has a much higher rate of volunteers at 30.3%, while Loftus has a much higher share of adults working or looking for work at 64.9%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,016
- First area, 2016: 4,135
- First area, 2021: 4,190
- Second area, 2011: 16
- Second area, 2016: 27
- Second area, 2021: 42
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 22 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Loftus: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Loftus: 1.1% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Loftus: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Loftus: 1.9% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Loftus: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Loftus: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Loftus: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Loftus: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Loftus: 3.8% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Royal National Park: 10.5% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Loftus: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 7.9% females
- 35–39 in Loftus: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 13.2% females
- 30–34 in Loftus: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Loftus: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 15.8% females
- 20–24 in Loftus: 3.0% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Royal National Park: 7.9% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Loftus: 4.1% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 10.5% females
- 10–14 in Loftus: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Royal National Park: 10.5% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Loftus: 3.8% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Royal National Park: 7.9% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Loftus: 3.9% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Royal National Park: 15.8% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $655
- First area, 2016: $778
- First area, 2021: $939
- Second area, 2011: $483
- Second area, 2016: $833
- Second area, 2021: $825
- First area, 2011: $1,671
- First area, 2016: $2,083
- First area, 2021: $2,425
- Second area, 2011: $100
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $1,875
- First area, 2011: $1,915
- First area, 2016: $2,269
- First area, 2021: $2,791
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 1.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $390
- First area, 2016: $535
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2016: $378
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,492
- First area, 2016: $2,275
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Loftus with nearby areas
Compare Royal National Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Loftus vs Royal National Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12380/loftus/vs/SAL13448/royal-national-park