Compare
Cecil Park vs Rossmore
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.5 km apart · Cecil Park profile · Rossmore profile
Cecil Park Rossmore
Rossmore (NSW) and Cecil Park are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Cecil Park is a wealthier area where the typical household earns $2,446 a week, compared to $1,827 in Rossmore (NSW). Education levels are also higher in Cecil Park, where nearly half of residents finished Year 12. In contrast, Rossmore (NSW) has a much higher proportion of renters at 31.7%, while only 14.7% of households rent in Cecil Park. These areas differ greatly in accessibility; Rossmore (NSW) is a 38-minute drive to the city, whereas Cecil Park takes far longer at 127 minutes.
While the gap in typical incomes is wide, both areas are very similar in how people live. They both have an almost identical share of people aged 65 and over and similar home sizes, with about 91% of dwellings having three or more bedrooms. The two areas also share a very low rate of public transport use for commuting. Both are largely car-dependent, with no homes situated within a 15-minute walk of health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,477
- First area, 2016: 771
- First area, 2021: 815
- Second area, 2011: 2,412
- Second area, 2016: 2,286
- Second area, 2021: 2,241
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Park: 0.5% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Rossmore: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Park: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Rossmore: 1.3% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Park: 3.0% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Rossmore: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Park: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Rossmore: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Rossmore: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Rossmore: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Park: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Rossmore: 3.4% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Park: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Rossmore: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Park: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Rossmore: 4.1% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Park: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Rossmore: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Park: 3.1% males, 1.8% females; 35–39 in Rossmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Park: 2.0% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Rossmore: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Park: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Rossmore: 3.4% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Park: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Rossmore: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Park: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Rossmore: 4.0% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Rossmore: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Park: 2.0% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Rossmore: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Park: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Rossmore: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $723
- First area, 2016: $700
- First area, 2021: $767
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $573
- Second area, 2021: $611
- First area, 2011: $1,750
- First area, 2016: $2,011
- First area, 2021: $2,446
- Second area, 2011: $1,284
- Second area, 2016: $1,452
- Second area, 2021: $1,827
- First area, 2011: $1,799
- First area, 2016: $1,916
- First area, 2021: $2,457
- Second area, 2011: $1,336
- Second area, 2016: $1,491
- Second area, 2021: $1,838
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.3
- Second area, 2016: 3.3
- Second area, 2021: 3.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $470
- First area, 2016: $370
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $423
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,550
- First area, 2021: $2,700
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cecil Park with nearby areas
Compare Rossmore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Park vs Rossmore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10865/cecil-park/vs/SAL13434/rossmore