Compare
Cecil Park vs Middleton Grange
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Cecil Park profile · Middleton Grange profile
Cecil Park Middleton Grange
Middleton Grange and Cecil Park are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Middleton Grange is a young, growing community where the typical resident is 31 and 30.3% of people are children under 15. It is a somewhat walkable area with far more people renting (26.5%) and a high number of recent arrivals, with 41.1% moving in during the last five years. In contrast, Cecil Park is more car-dependent, with an older typical resident aged 43 and a much higher share of homes owned outright at 48.6%.
Everyday life in both places shares similar typical weekly household incomes of around $2,344 to $2,446 and nearly identical rates of people working from home. While they share these economic traits, their layout is opposite; Middleton Grange has far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a park (99.7% compared to 10.5% in Cecil Park) and a much shorter drive time to the city. These gaps in accessibility and age remain stark between the two neighbours.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,477
- First area, 2016: 771
- First area, 2021: 815
- Second area, 2011: 515
- Second area, 2016: 5,177
- Second area, 2021: 7,043
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Park: 0.5% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Middleton Grange: 0.1% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Park: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Middleton Grange: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Park: 3.0% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Middleton Grange: 0.5% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Park: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Middleton Grange: 1.0% males, 0.7% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Middleton Grange: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Middleton Grange: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Park: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Middleton Grange: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Park: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Middleton Grange: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Park: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Middleton Grange: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Park: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Middleton Grange: 4.6% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Park: 3.1% males, 1.8% females; 35–39 in Middleton Grange: 5.3% males, 5.8% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Park: 2.0% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Middleton Grange: 4.0% males, 5.0% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Park: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Middleton Grange: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Park: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Middleton Grange: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Park: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Middleton Grange: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Middleton Grange: 4.7% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Park: 2.0% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Middleton Grange: 5.9% males, 5.1% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Park: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Middleton Grange: 5.3% males, 4.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $723
- First area, 2016: $700
- First area, 2021: $767
- Second area, 2011: $661
- Second area, 2016: $847
- Second area, 2021: $861
- First area, 2011: $1,750
- First area, 2016: $2,011
- First area, 2021: $2,446
- Second area, 2011: $1,568
- Second area, 2016: $2,124
- Second area, 2021: $2,344
- First area, 2011: $1,799
- First area, 2016: $1,916
- First area, 2021: $2,457
- Second area, 2011: $1,571
- Second area, 2016: $2,129
- Second area, 2021: $2,381
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $470
- First area, 2016: $370
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $520
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,550
- First area, 2021: $2,700
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,400
- Second area, 2021: $2,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cecil Park with nearby areas
Compare Middleton Grange with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Park vs Middleton Grange [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10865/cecil-park/vs/SAL12618/middleton-grange