Compare
Cecil Park vs Elizabeth Hills
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.8 km apart · Cecil Park profile · Elizabeth Hills profile
Cecil Park Elizabeth Hills
Elizabeth Hills and Cecil Park are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Elizabeth Hills is a young community where the typical resident is 31, and 29.5% of people are children under 15. It is far more walkable (somewhat walkable) than Cecil Park (car-dependent), with 100% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park. In contrast, Cecil Park has a much older population, with a typical age of 43 and 20.1% of residents aged 65 and over. Home ownership also differs sharply, as 48.6% of Cecil Park homes are owned outright, compared to just 15.1% in Elizabeth Hills.
Everyday life shares many similarities in both places, including typical weekly household incomes that sit around $2,400. They also have nearly identical shares of people needing help with daily activities and those who have served in the Defence Force. While they share these traits, the gap in accessibility is stark; Elizabeth Hills has a 34-minute drive to the city and easy access to transport, while Cecil Park is much further away with a 127-minute drive.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,477
- First area, 2016: 771
- First area, 2021: 815
- Second area, 2011: 0
- Second area, 2016: 2,535
- Second area, 2021: 3,208
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Park: 0.5% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Elizabeth Hills: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Park: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Elizabeth Hills: 0.3% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Park: 3.0% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Elizabeth Hills: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Park: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.0% males, 0.8% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Park: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Elizabeth Hills: 2.8% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Park: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Elizabeth Hills: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Park: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Elizabeth Hills: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Park: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.4% males, 5.0% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Park: 3.1% males, 1.8% females; 35–39 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.0% males, 5.3% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Park: 2.0% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Elizabeth Hills: 3.5% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Park: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.9% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Park: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Elizabeth Hills: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Park: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.0% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.6% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Park: 2.0% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Elizabeth Hills: 6.1% males, 4.9% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Park: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.8% males, 4.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $723
- First area, 2016: $700
- First area, 2021: $767
- Second area, 2016: $759
- Second area, 2021: $822
- First area, 2011: $1,750
- First area, 2016: $2,011
- First area, 2021: $2,446
- Second area, 2016: $2,003
- Second area, 2021: $2,413
- First area, 2011: $1,799
- First area, 2016: $1,916
- First area, 2021: $2,457
- Second area, 2016: $1,933
- Second area, 2021: $2,388
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2016: 3.6
- Second area, 2021: 3.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $470
- First area, 2016: $370
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $560
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,550
- First area, 2021: $2,700
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,513
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cecil Park with nearby areas
Compare Elizabeth Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Park vs Elizabeth Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10865/cecil-park/vs/SAL11400/elizabeth-hills