Compare
Cecil Hills vs Elizabeth Hills
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Cecil Hills profile · Elizabeth Hills profile
Cecil Hills Elizabeth Hills
Cecil Hills and Elizabeth Hills are neighbouring areas in Greater Sydney with very different family profiles. Elizabeth Hills is much younger, with children under 15 making up 29.5% of the population compared to 17.7% in Cecil Hills. This is consistent with a much higher share of people in Elizabeth Hills providing unpaid childcare (34.4% versus 21.4%). In contrast, Cecil Hills is more walkable, with 82.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 12.7% of homes in Elizabeth Hills have the same access. Home ownership also differs, as 35.7% of homes in Cecil Hills are owned outright, compared to just 15.1% in Elizabeth Hills.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the typical age of residents, though the typical person in Cecil Hills is 38 and in Elizabeth Hills is 31. They are also very similar in other ways, sharing nearly identical typical weekly household incomes of around $2,410 and similar rates of volunteering. While they share these commonalities, the two areas have diverged in their transport access; far more people in Elizabeth Hills can reach other places via public transit within 45 minutes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,865
- First area, 2016: 7,018
- First area, 2021: 6,906
- Second area, 2011: 0
- Second area, 2016: 2,535
- Second area, 2021: 3,208
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Elizabeth Hills: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Elizabeth Hills: 0.3% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Elizabeth Hills: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.0% males, 0.8% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Elizabeth Hills: 2.8% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Elizabeth Hills: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Elizabeth Hills: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.4% males, 5.0% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.0% males, 5.3% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Elizabeth Hills: 3.5% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Elizabeth Hills: 1.9% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Elizabeth Hills: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.0% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.6% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Elizabeth Hills: 6.1% males, 4.9% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Elizabeth Hills: 4.8% males, 4.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $600
- First area, 2016: $672
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2016: $759
- Second area, 2021: $822
- First area, 2011: $1,832
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,409
- Second area, 2016: $2,003
- Second area, 2021: $2,413
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $2,079
- First area, 2021: $2,346
- Second area, 2016: $1,933
- Second area, 2021: $2,388
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.7
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2016: 3.6
- Second area, 2021: 3.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $420
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $560
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,513
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Compare Elizabeth Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Hills vs Elizabeth Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10864/cecil-hills/vs/SAL11400/elizabeth-hills