Compare
Cecil Hills vs Middleton Grange
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.3 km apart · Cecil Hills profile · Middleton Grange profile
Cecil Hills Middleton Grange
Middleton Grange and Cecil Hills are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes. Middleton Grange is much younger, with a typical resident aged 31 and 30.3% of the population being children under 15. This helps explain why 37.2% of adults there are unpaid carers for children. In contrast, Cecil Hills is older, and its residents are far more likely to own their homes outright (35.7% compared to 10.9% in Middleton Grange). Cecil Hills also has a much higher share of people who speak a First Nations language (32.0%).
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, with both maintaining high shares of people born overseas and those using a language other than English at home. They also share a similar typical weekly household income of around $2,300 to $2,400. However, the gap in mobility is stark; Middleton Grange is much more transient, with 41.1% of people moving in the last five years, while Cecil Hills is far more stable at 22.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,865
- First area, 2016: 7,018
- First area, 2021: 6,906
- Second area, 2011: 515
- Second area, 2016: 5,177
- Second area, 2021: 7,043
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Middleton Grange: 0.1% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Middleton Grange: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Middleton Grange: 0.5% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Middleton Grange: 1.0% males, 0.7% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Middleton Grange: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Middleton Grange: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Middleton Grange: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Middleton Grange: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Middleton Grange: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Middleton Grange: 4.6% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Middleton Grange: 5.3% males, 5.8% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Middleton Grange: 4.0% males, 5.0% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Middleton Grange: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Middleton Grange: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Middleton Grange: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Middleton Grange: 4.7% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Middleton Grange: 5.9% males, 5.1% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Middleton Grange: 5.3% males, 4.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $600
- First area, 2016: $672
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2011: $661
- Second area, 2016: $847
- Second area, 2021: $861
- First area, 2011: $1,832
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,409
- Second area, 2011: $1,568
- Second area, 2016: $2,124
- Second area, 2021: $2,344
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $2,079
- First area, 2021: $2,346
- Second area, 2011: $1,571
- Second area, 2016: $2,129
- Second area, 2021: $2,381
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.7
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $420
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $520
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,400
- Second area, 2021: $2,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Compare Middleton Grange with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Hills vs Middleton Grange [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10864/cecil-hills/vs/SAL12618/middleton-grange