Compare
Cecil Hills vs Mount Vernon
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.8 km apart · Cecil Hills profile · Mount Vernon profile
Cecil Hills Mount Vernon
Cecil Hills and Mount Vernon are neighbouring areas in Greater Sydney with very different street layouts. Cecil Hills is more developed for pedestrians, described as somewhat walkable, and has far more people born overseas (44.2%) and who use another language at home (57.8%). It also has a much larger presence of First Nations languages, spoken by 32.0% of residents. Mount Vernon is more car-dependent and has a wealthier profile, with a typical household income of $3,177 per week compared to $2,409 in Cecil Hills. Home ownership is also more secure in Mount Vernon, where 55.3% of homes are owned outright.
Both areas share a similar family makeup, with exactly 17.7% of people being children under 15. This mirrors a national pattern where family sizes and ages remain consistent across these neighbouring spots. They also both have similar rates of people with long-term health conditions, which sit around 21%. While Cecil Hills has far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a park or school, both areas see very few people commuting by public transport.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,865
- First area, 2016: 7,018
- First area, 2021: 6,906
- Second area, 2011: 1,036
- Second area, 2016: 1,192
- Second area, 2021: 1,235
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cecil Hills: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Mount Vernon: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Cecil Hills: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Mount Vernon: 1.4% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Cecil Hills: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Vernon: 1.6% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Cecil Hills: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Vernon: 1.8% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Cecil Hills: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Mount Vernon: 2.7% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Mount Vernon: 4.5% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Cecil Hills: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Mount Vernon: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Cecil Hills: 3.9% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Mount Vernon: 4.1% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Mount Vernon: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Mount Vernon: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Cecil Hills: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Mount Vernon: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Cecil Hills: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Mount Vernon: 2.2% males, 1.5% females
- 25–29 in Cecil Hills: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Mount Vernon: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Cecil Hills: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Vernon: 4.7% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Cecil Hills: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Mount Vernon: 4.5% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Cecil Hills: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Mount Vernon: 3.8% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Cecil Hills: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Mount Vernon: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Cecil Hills: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Vernon: 1.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $600
- First area, 2016: $672
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2011: $597
- Second area, 2016: $790
- Second area, 2021: $917
- First area, 2011: $1,832
- First area, 2016: $2,137
- First area, 2021: $2,409
- Second area, 2011: $1,773
- Second area, 2016: $2,565
- Second area, 2021: $3,177
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $2,079
- First area, 2021: $2,346
- Second area, 2011: $1,937
- Second area, 2016: $2,459
- Second area, 2021: $3,009
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.7
- First area, 2016: 3.7
- First area, 2021: 3.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.5
- Second area, 2016: 3.6
- Second area, 2021: 3.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $420
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2011: $275
- Second area, 2016: $375
- Second area, 2021: $495
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $3,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $3,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cecil Hills with nearby areas
Compare Mount Vernon with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cecil Hills vs Mount Vernon [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10864/cecil-hills/vs/SAL12807/mount-vernon