Compare
Bishops Bridge vs Gillieston Heights
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.0 km apart · Bishops Bridge profile · Gillieston Heights profile
Bishops Bridge Gillieston Heights
Gillieston Heights and Bishops Bridge are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Gillieston Heights is a growing hub where the typical resident is just 30, and many people have moved there in the last five years. It is more walkable, with a score of 5.9 (somewhat walkable), and has far more renters (37.8%) who pay a typical weekly rent of $430. In contrast, Bishops Bridge is sparsely populated and car-dependent, with a much older population; the typical resident is 43 and 21.6% are seniors. Homes there are more likely to be owned outright (44.3%) and the typical rent is much lower at $185.
Everyday life shares many similarities across both places, as typical weekly household incomes are almost identical at around $1,950 to $2,000. They also have the same average household size of 2.8 people and similar rates of adults working or looking for work. While Gillieston Heights has seen a surge in new arrivals and a young population, Bishops Bridge remains more stable and older, with the gap in home ownership and rent between these two neighbours remaining significant.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 225
- First area, 2016: 248
- First area, 2021: 218
- Second area, 2011: 1,372
- Second area, 2016: 3,150
- Second area, 2021: 4,796
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 30 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bishops Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Gillieston Heights: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Bishops Bridge: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Gillieston Heights: 0.5% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Bishops Bridge: 1.4% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Gillieston Heights: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Bishops Bridge: 1.4% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Gillieston Heights: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 65–69 in Bishops Bridge: 6.1% males, 4.2% females; 65–69 in Gillieston Heights: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Bishops Bridge: 2.8% males, 6.6% females; 60–64 in Gillieston Heights: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Bishops Bridge: 4.2% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Gillieston Heights: 1.1% males, 1.9% females
- 50–54 in Bishops Bridge: 3.8% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Gillieston Heights: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 45–49 in Bishops Bridge: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Gillieston Heights: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Bishops Bridge: 2.3% males, 1.4% females; 40–44 in Gillieston Heights: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Bishops Bridge: 4.7% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Gillieston Heights: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Bishops Bridge: 1.4% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Gillieston Heights: 5.5% males, 5.9% females
- 25–29 in Bishops Bridge: 1.4% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Gillieston Heights: 3.9% males, 5.8% females
- 20–24 in Bishops Bridge: 1.4% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Gillieston Heights: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Bishops Bridge: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 15–19 in Gillieston Heights: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Bishops Bridge: 4.7% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Gillieston Heights: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Bishops Bridge: 2.8% males, 4.2% females; 5–9 in Gillieston Heights: 5.0% males, 4.5% females
- 0–4 in Bishops Bridge: 4.7% males, 1.4% females; 0–4 in Gillieston Heights: 5.4% males, 5.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $534
- First area, 2016: $666
- First area, 2021: $762
- Second area, 2011: $536
- Second area, 2016: $767
- Second area, 2021: $947
- First area, 2011: $1,343
- First area, 2016: $1,916
- First area, 2021: $1,949
- Second area, 2011: $1,183
- Second area, 2016: $1,712
- Second area, 2021: $1,986
- First area, 2011: $971
- First area, 2016: $2,156
- First area, 2021: $2,139
- Second area, 2011: $1,460
- Second area, 2016: $1,870
- Second area, 2021: $2,159
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $98
- First area, 2021: $185
- Second area, 2011: $340
- Second area, 2016: $395
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $1,550
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,928
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bishops Bridge with nearby areas
Compare Gillieston Heights with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bishops Bridge vs Gillieston Heights [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10379/bishops-bridge/vs/SAL11628/gillieston-heights