Compare
Gillieston Heights vs Louth Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.7 km apart · Gillieston Heights profile · Louth Park profile
Gillieston Heights Louth Park
Gillieston Heights and Louth Park are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with very different lifestyles. Louth Park is a high-income area where the typical household earns $3,293 a week, while the typical income in Gillieston Heights is $1,986. Louth Park is also more likely to be owner-occupied, with 31.7% of homes owned outright compared to 18.4% in Gillieston Heights. In contrast, Gillieston Heights is more walkable (somewhat walkable) and better connected, with 89.4% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport, whereas only 3.8% of Louth Park homes have that access.
These two places are moving further apart in terms of their residents' backgrounds. Gillieston Heights has seen a much higher influx of new arrivals, with 60.0% of people moving in during the last five years, including 11.1% arriving from overseas. Louth Park is more stable and homogeneous, with no recent overseas arrivals. Despite these diverging trends, they share a similar employment landscape, as about 61% of people in both areas work full-time.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,372
- First area, 2016: 3,150
- First area, 2021: 4,796
- Second area, 2011: 640
- Second area, 2016: 654
- Second area, 2021: 922
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 29 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gillieston Heights: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Louth Park: 0.4% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Gillieston Heights: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Louth Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Gillieston Heights: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Louth Park: 0.8% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Gillieston Heights: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Louth Park: 1.1% males, 0.4% females
- 65–69 in Gillieston Heights: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Louth Park: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Gillieston Heights: 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 60–64 in Louth Park: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Gillieston Heights: 1.1% males, 1.9% females; 55–59 in Louth Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Gillieston Heights: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 50–54 in Louth Park: 4.7% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Gillieston Heights: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Louth Park: 4.7% males, 5.5% females
- 40–44 in Gillieston Heights: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Louth Park: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Gillieston Heights: 4.5% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Louth Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Gillieston Heights: 5.5% males, 5.9% females; 30–34 in Louth Park: 2.6% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Gillieston Heights: 3.9% males, 5.8% females; 25–29 in Louth Park: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Gillieston Heights: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Louth Park: 3.9% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Gillieston Heights: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Louth Park: 4.9% males, 4.0% females
- 10–14 in Gillieston Heights: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Louth Park: 6.5% males, 4.2% females
- 5–9 in Gillieston Heights: 5.0% males, 4.5% females; 5–9 in Louth Park: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Gillieston Heights: 5.4% males, 5.3% females; 0–4 in Louth Park: 2.7% males, 1.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $536
- First area, 2016: $767
- First area, 2021: $947
- Second area, 2011: $764
- Second area, 2016: $826
- Second area, 2021: $1,033
- First area, 2011: $1,183
- First area, 2016: $1,712
- First area, 2021: $1,986
- Second area, 2011: $2,444
- Second area, 2016: $2,694
- Second area, 2021: $3,293
- First area, 2011: $1,460
- First area, 2016: $1,870
- First area, 2021: $2,159
- Second area, 2011: $2,449
- Second area, 2016: $2,691
- Second area, 2021: $3,192
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.5
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $340
- First area, 2016: $395
- First area, 2021: $430
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,928
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,863
- Second area, 2021: $2,579
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gillieston Heights with nearby areas
Compare Louth Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gillieston Heights vs Louth Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11628/gillieston-heights/vs/SAL12404/louth-park