Compare
Bexhill vs McLeans Ridges
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.9 km apart · Bexhill profile · McLeans Ridges profile
Bexhill McLeans Ridges
McLeans Ridges and Bexhill are neighbouring rural areas with a few striking differences. McLeans Ridges is wealthier, with a typical household income of $2,305 per week and 30.1% of homes earning $3,000 or more. It also has a more qualified workforce, as more residents have completed Year 12 or hold a bachelor's degree. In contrast, Bexhill is far more connected to services; 40% of its homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, while McLeans Ridges has no such homes and no public transport stops.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people who provide unpaid care. They are also very similar in terms of their Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations, as well as the number of people born overseas. While they share these commonalities, the two areas have diverged in other ways, such as recent overseas arrivals, which are far higher in Bexhill at 19.6% compared to 3.7% in McLeans Ridges.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 485
- First area, 2016: 495
- First area, 2021: 528
- Second area, 2011: 623
- Second area, 2016: 510
- Second area, 2021: 808
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bexhill: 0.0% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in McLeans Ridges: 0.0% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Bexhill: 0.8% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in McLeans Ridges: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bexhill: 1.1% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in McLeans Ridges: 2.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Bexhill: 3.9% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in McLeans Ridges: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Bexhill: 2.8% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in McLeans Ridges: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Bexhill: 4.3% males, 5.3% females; 60–64 in McLeans Ridges: 4.2% males, 5.0% females
- 55–59 in Bexhill: 4.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in McLeans Ridges: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Bexhill: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in McLeans Ridges: 4.8% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Bexhill: 4.7% males, 4.7% females; 45–49 in McLeans Ridges: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Bexhill: 1.5% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in McLeans Ridges: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Bexhill: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in McLeans Ridges: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Bexhill: 3.2% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in McLeans Ridges: 1.7% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Bexhill: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in McLeans Ridges: 2.5% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Bexhill: 1.1% males, 0.6% females; 20–24 in McLeans Ridges: 2.0% males, 0.9% females
- 15–19 in Bexhill: 3.8% males, 1.1% females; 15–19 in McLeans Ridges: 3.9% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Bexhill: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in McLeans Ridges: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Bexhill: 4.5% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in McLeans Ridges: 4.5% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Bexhill: 2.4% males, 4.3% females; 0–4 in McLeans Ridges: 1.5% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $540
- First area, 2016: $681
- First area, 2021: $773
- Second area, 2011: $584
- Second area, 2016: $737
- Second area, 2021: $842
- First area, 2011: $1,281
- First area, 2016: $1,454
- First area, 2021: $1,704
- Second area, 2011: $1,321
- Second area, 2016: $1,934
- Second area, 2021: $2,305
- First area, 2011: $1,375
- First area, 2016: $1,562
- First area, 2021: $1,862
- Second area, 2011: $1,580
- Second area, 2016: $1,906
- Second area, 2021: $2,346
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $220
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $295
- Second area, 2016: $340
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,409
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $2,134
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bexhill with nearby areas
Compare McLeans Ridges with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bexhill vs McLeans Ridges [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10332/bexhill/vs/SAL12555/mcleans-ridges