Compare
Lindendale vs McLeans Ridges
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.7 km apart · Lindendale profile · McLeans Ridges profile
Lindendale McLeans Ridges
McLeans Ridges and Lindendale are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with distinct profiles. McLeans Ridges is more likely to have larger homes, with 84.1% having three or more bedrooms, compared to 67.4% in Lindendale. Pay is also higher in McLeans Ridges, where the typical household earns $2,305 a week compared to $1,771 in Lindendale. This is also seen among First Nations residents, with a typical personal income of $1,499 in McLeans Ridges, which is far higher than the $725 typical income in Lindendale.
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked differently, with a much higher share of people moving into McLeans Ridges (40.3%) over the last five years compared to Lindendale (26.1%). Despite this, they share several similarities, such as having almost identical shares of children under 15 and adults with a bachelor degree. Both are also very car-dependent, with no one commuting by public transport. Lindendale has a notably older population, as the typical resident is 49 compared to 45 in McLeans Ridges.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 320
- First area, 2016: 245
- First area, 2021: 263
- Second area, 2011: 623
- Second area, 2016: 510
- Second area, 2021: 808
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lindendale: 1.1% males, 3.0% females; 85+ in McLeans Ridges: 0.0% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Lindendale: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in McLeans Ridges: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Lindendale: 4.1% males, 3.3% females; 75–79 in McLeans Ridges: 2.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Lindendale: 3.3% males, 5.2% females; 70–74 in McLeans Ridges: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Lindendale: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in McLeans Ridges: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Lindendale: 2.6% males, 5.9% females; 60–64 in McLeans Ridges: 4.2% males, 5.0% females
- 55–59 in Lindendale: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in McLeans Ridges: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Lindendale: 4.1% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in McLeans Ridges: 4.8% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Lindendale: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in McLeans Ridges: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Lindendale: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in McLeans Ridges: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Lindendale: 4.4% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in McLeans Ridges: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Lindendale: 2.2% males, 1.5% females; 30–34 in McLeans Ridges: 1.7% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Lindendale: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 25–29 in McLeans Ridges: 2.5% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Lindendale: 1.1% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in McLeans Ridges: 2.0% males, 0.9% females
- 15–19 in Lindendale: 3.3% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in McLeans Ridges: 3.9% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Lindendale: 3.3% males, 1.9% females; 10–14 in McLeans Ridges: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Lindendale: 3.3% males, 1.5% females; 5–9 in McLeans Ridges: 4.5% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Lindendale: 3.0% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in McLeans Ridges: 1.5% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $585
- First area, 2016: $728
- First area, 2021: $766
- Second area, 2011: $584
- Second area, 2016: $737
- Second area, 2021: $842
- First area, 2011: $1,197
- First area, 2016: $1,786
- First area, 2021: $1,771
- Second area, 2011: $1,321
- Second area, 2016: $1,934
- Second area, 2021: $2,305
- First area, 2011: $1,327
- First area, 2016: $1,946
- First area, 2021: $1,916
- Second area, 2011: $1,580
- Second area, 2016: $1,906
- Second area, 2021: $2,346
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $275
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $273
- Second area, 2011: $295
- Second area, 2016: $340
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,102
- First area, 2021: $1,691
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lindendale with nearby areas
Compare McLeans Ridges with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lindendale vs McLeans Ridges [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12345/lindendale/vs/SAL12555/mcleans-ridges