Compare
Cottesloe - Claremont vs Canning
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Cottesloe - Claremont profile · Canning profile
Cottesloe - Claremont Canning
Canning and Cottesloe - Claremont are nearby areas with very different profiles. Canning is much more culturally diverse, with 50.4% of people born overseas and 41.9% using a language other than English at home. In contrast, Cottesloe - Claremont has higher levels of qualification and wealth; 52.7% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, and the typical weekly family income is $3,945, which is far higher than Canning's $2,125. Cottesloe - Claremont also has a higher share of homes owned outright at 42.4%.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have often widened. Typical family incomes and the share of people born overseas have diverged further, while the difference in typical weekly household income has grown to $990. Despite these shifts, they share several similarities, such as having nearly the same proportion of children under 15 and almost identical numbers of people per home. Both areas also have similar rates of people moving in the last five years, at around 43%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 64,134
- First area, 2016: 67,634
- First area, 2021: 71,735
- Second area, 2011: 88,763
- Second area, 2016: 93,597
- Second area, 2021: 99,139
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cottesloe - Claremont: 1.2% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Canning: 0.8% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Canning: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Canning: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Canning: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Canning: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Canning: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Canning: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Canning: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Canning: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Canning: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Canning: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Canning: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Canning: 4.3% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Canning: 4.4% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Canning: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Canning: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Canning: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Canning: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $818
- First area, 2016: $926
- First area, 2021: $1,122
- Second area, 2011: $582
- Second area, 2016: $605
- Second area, 2021: $760
- First area, 2011: $2,111
- First area, 2016: $2,358
- First area, 2021: $2,790
- Second area, 2011: $1,384
- Second area, 2016: $1,524
- Second area, 2021: $1,800
- First area, 2011: $2,726
- First area, 2016: $3,387
- First area, 2021: $3,945
- Second area, 2011: $1,705
- Second area, 2016: $1,780
- Second area, 2021: $2,125
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,817
- First area, 2016: $3,000
- First area, 2021: $3,293
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,820
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cottesloe - Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Canning with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cottesloe - Claremont vs Canning [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/50301/cottesloe-claremont/vs/50603/canning