Compare
Cottesloe - Claremont vs Cockburn
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Cottesloe - Claremont profile · Cockburn profile
Cottesloe - Claremont Cockburn
Cockburn and Cottesloe - Claremont are two nearby areas in Greater Perth with very different profiles. Cottesloe - Claremont is a high-income hub where the typical weekly family income is $3,945 and 52.7% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher. In contrast, Cockburn has a younger population and more family-oriented housing, with 85.5% of homes having three or more bedrooms compared to 75.2% in Cottesloe - Claremont. Cockburn also has a higher share of people using another language at home (21.6%) and a larger proportion of separate houses.
Both areas share a similar housing market structure, with exactly 25.4% of households renting. They also have an identical typical number of people per home (2.6) and nearly the same unemployment rate. While they are alike in these respects, the gap in wealth has grown over time; the difference in typical family income has widened from $921 in 2011 to $1,605 today. Similarly, the gap in the number of people earning $2,000 or more a week has increased since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 64,134
- First area, 2016: 67,634
- First area, 2021: 71,735
- Second area, 2011: 87,413
- Second area, 2016: 102,028
- Second area, 2021: 115,824
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cottesloe - Claremont: 1.2% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Cockburn: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Cockburn: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Cockburn: 1.1% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Cockburn: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Cockburn: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Cockburn: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Cockburn: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Cockburn: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Cockburn: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Cockburn: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Cockburn: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Cockburn: 4.0% males, 4.3% females
- 25–29 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Cockburn: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Cockburn: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Cockburn: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Cockburn: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Cockburn: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Cockburn: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $818
- First area, 2016: $926
- First area, 2021: $1,122
- Second area, 2011: $689
- Second area, 2016: $761
- Second area, 2021: $919
- First area, 2011: $2,111
- First area, 2016: $2,358
- First area, 2021: $2,790
- Second area, 2011: $1,540
- Second area, 2016: $1,745
- Second area, 2021: $1,988
- First area, 2011: $2,726
- First area, 2016: $3,387
- First area, 2021: $3,945
- Second area, 2011: $1,805
- Second area, 2016: $2,028
- Second area, 2021: $2,340
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $370
- First area, 2011: $2,817
- First area, 2016: $3,000
- First area, 2021: $3,293
- Second area, 2011: $2,006
- Second area, 2016: $2,058
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cottesloe - Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Cockburn with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cottesloe - Claremont vs Cockburn [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/50301/cottesloe-claremont/vs/50701/cockburn