Compare
Cottesloe - Claremont vs Stirling
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Cottesloe - Claremont profile · Stirling profile
Cottesloe - Claremont Stirling
Stirling and Cottesloe - Claremont are nearby Western Australian areas with very different financial profiles. Cottesloe - Claremont is far wealthier, with a typical family income of $3,945 per week compared to $2,313 in Stirling. This wealth is reflected in education and home ownership; adults in Cottesloe - Claremont are far more likely to have a bachelor degree or higher (52.7% versus 32.7% in Stirling) and are more likely to own their homes outright. Stirling is much more linguistically diverse, with 27.6% of people using another language at home, which is far higher than the 14.5% in Cottesloe - Claremont.
Both areas sit very close to the national figure for the share of people with long-term health conditions. They also share similar proportions of children under 15 and have nearly identical unemployment rates. While these commonalities exist, the economic gap between them has generally widened since 2011, particularly regarding typical weekly incomes and the share of households earning $3,000 or more.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 64,134
- First area, 2016: 67,634
- First area, 2021: 71,735
- Second area, 2011: 178,430
- Second area, 2016: 192,425
- Second area, 2021: 208,149
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cottesloe - Claremont: 1.2% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Stirling: 1.0% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Stirling: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Stirling: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Stirling: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Stirling: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Stirling: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Stirling: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Stirling: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Stirling: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Stirling: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Stirling: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Stirling: 4.3% males, 4.5% females
- 25–29 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Stirling: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Stirling: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Stirling: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Stirling: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Stirling: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Cottesloe - Claremont: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Stirling: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $818
- First area, 2016: $926
- First area, 2021: $1,122
- Second area, 2011: $682
- Second area, 2016: $761
- Second area, 2021: $904
- First area, 2011: $2,111
- First area, 2016: $2,358
- First area, 2021: $2,790
- Second area, 2011: $1,345
- Second area, 2016: $1,558
- Second area, 2021: $1,784
- First area, 2011: $2,726
- First area, 2016: $3,387
- First area, 2021: $3,945
- Second area, 2011: $1,755
- Second area, 2016: $1,983
- Second area, 2021: $2,313
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $355
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,817
- First area, 2016: $3,000
- First area, 2021: $3,293
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cottesloe - Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Stirling with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cottesloe - Claremont vs Stirling [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/50301/cottesloe-claremont/vs/50502/stirling