Compare
Granite Belt vs Ipswich Hinterland
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 70 km apart · Granite Belt profile · Ipswich Hinterland profile
Granite Belt Ipswich Hinterland
Granite Belt and Ipswich Hinterland are both rural Queensland areas, but they differ in their accessibility and age. Granite Belt is much more remote, with a typical drive time to the city of 119 minutes compared to 58 minutes in Ipswich Hinterland. Residents in Granite Belt are noticeably older, with a typical age of 47 and 26% aged 65 or over, while Ipswich Hinterland's typical age is 42. Granite Belt also has more homes within a 15-minute walk of schools (37.9%), parks (45.5%), and groceries (32.3%), whereas Ipswich Hinterland has far better public transport options, including 11.7% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a stop.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have generally widened. The age difference has grown from two to five years, and the share of people living alone is now 6.8 percentage points higher in Granite Belt. Despite these diverging trends, the two areas remain very similar in other ways. They have nearly identical shares of First Nations people (about 5.3%), children under 15, and people born overseas. Both areas also sit well above the national figure for homes owned outright, though this is most prominent in Granite Belt where 41.9% of homes are owned without a mortgage.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 38,500
- First area, 2016: 40,101
- First area, 2021: 41,520
- Second area, 2011: 56,949
- Second area, 2016: 62,726
- Second area, 2021: 67,292
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Granite Belt: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Ipswich Hinterland: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Granite Belt: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Ipswich Hinterland: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Granite Belt: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Granite Belt: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 70–74 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Granite Belt: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Granite Belt: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Granite Belt: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Granite Belt: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Granite Belt: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Granite Belt: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Granite Belt: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Granite Belt: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Granite Belt: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Granite Belt: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Granite Belt: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Granite Belt: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Granite Belt: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Ipswich Hinterland: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Granite Belt: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Ipswich Hinterland: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $446
- First area, 2016: $510
- First area, 2021: $595
- Second area, 2011: $472
- Second area, 2016: $538
- Second area, 2021: $648
- First area, 2011: $841
- First area, 2016: $988
- First area, 2021: $1,127
- Second area, 2011: $991
- Second area, 2016: $1,172
- Second area, 2021: $1,406
- First area, 2011: $1,003
- First area, 2016: $1,226
- First area, 2021: $1,417
- Second area, 2011: $1,164
- Second area, 2016: $1,354
- Second area, 2021: $1,641
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $195
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $255
- Second area, 2011: $245
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Granite Belt with nearby areas
Compare Ipswich Hinterland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Granite Belt vs Ipswich Hinterland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/30703/granite-belt/vs/31002/ipswich-hinterland